Answer:
$15,576 should appear as Cash and Cash Equivalents on the balance sheet
Explanation:
Cash and Cash Equivalents
= Cash in a checking account + Cash in saving account + High-grade government securities
= $5,000 + $7,000 + $3,576
= $15,576
Therefore, $15,576 should appear as Cash and Cash Equivalents on the balance sheet
Answer:
B. 10.79 percent
Explanation:
yield to maturity = [150 + (1250 - 1000/10)]/[(1250 + 1000/2)]
= 10.79%
Therefore, The yield to maturity on the Tangshan Industries bond is 10.79%
Answer:
b. The fair value of the contingent consideration is included in the overall fair value of the consideration transferred, and a liability or additional owners' equity is recognized.
Explanation:
Measuring the fair value of contingent consideration for financial reporting is a complex process – based on a number of variable inputs, unique risk profiles, and potentially complicated payoff structures.
Tesla has created over 1,500 jobs at its ATVM-supported facilities. The Department of Energy's investment in Tesla supports the commercial deployment of advanced technologies that help U.S. automakers remain competitive in the growing global advanced vehicle market. This is the purpose of tesla serving the economy.
The economy is the field of production, distribution, trade and consumption of goods and services. Generally, it is defined as a social domain emphasizing practices, discourses, and material expressions related to the production, use, and management of scarce resources.
Learn more about the economy here:brainly.com/question/1106682
#SPJ4
Answer:
The Supreme Court ruled that the name Coke was so well known around the world, that it is effectively a common term for the trademarked Coca Cola. If other companies try to use similar terms like Koke for other types of products, e.g. bakery items, there is a risk that the Coca Cola company would be negatively affected by that product's image since consumers might associate Koke directly to Coca Cola.
It doesn't matter if the products were low quality or not, the courts cannot determine that, what matters is that the use of the term may negatively impact another company.
