Letting a person die is providing a person a release from death. It is as if he was suffering, and letting that person die is stopping his suffering, and letting him be at peace. He is no longer in the pain that death provides.
Bringing about a person's death, on the other hand, such as using a lethal injection on a person, is harming the person and putting him/her in pain. While in the other situation you are providing the person with relief, here, you are the one bringing about the person's pain.
But I believe that Rachel might think that letting a person die is much worse than causing the person pain because letting the person die if letting go of the person completely. You leave the person helpless, and as they are dying and screaming for your help, you just stand by and let it happen. You do nothing about it. You are simply a bystander, watching as said person slips into a wholly different reality altogether. Causing a person's death has a certain surety in it. You are causing a person's death, and you are probably doing it for a personal reason. There is a certain type of surety in causing a persons' death because you are the one causing it, while in the other situation, you are simply watching, letting it happen.
Answer:
True
The moon is the only satellite that the earth has
Answer:
The declaration states that all humans are entitled to basic rights including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It also states that if the government withholds these basic rights from citizens, citizens have the right to revolt against the government.
The declaration says that the ultimate power in a nation rests with its people.
Explanation:
pls mark brainliest btw
Answer:
Colvin took control and stood to her actions as a good leader. She was determined to set goals and accomplish these goals. Her goal growing up to make a difference was something she completely achieved. Like her desires, she was able to fight for civil rights, not just for herself but for her people.
Explanation:
