Answer:
problem or emotion
Explanation:
The presence of personal problems or issues which bothers the mind is almost inevitable. The only difference is that the problems individuals have to deal with aren't the same. In that case, as individuals we need to come up with a way to manage and solve interpersonal and personal issues. This act of managing personal issues is called coping.
Problem based coping is a coping management form whereby one manages issues by changing the circumstance leading to one's problem. That is if it is where we live, relocation may be a way out.
Emotion based coping involves, changing or working on our state of mind especially in cases where the circumstance leading to one's issues or problems cannot be changed.
Answer
Yes
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation can solve this problem because since this issue deals on the national level, they can propose an amendment for the abolishment of slavery.
Based on biblical and historical records, the prophet that introduced a third way for the Israelites to live in exile is known as <u>Ezra</u>.
<h3>The Return of Israelites to Land of Zion</h3>
The historical records showed that the Israelites were led to the Land of Israel from Babylon under a decree of Cyrus the Great around 539 BC.
During the mass movement of Israelites to the Land of Israel or Zion, three Prophets led the Israelites.
<h3>The Prophets that led the Israelites to the Land of Zion</h3>
Following the decree of Cyrus the Great in 539 BC, three different prophets led the Israelites out of Babylon at three different times. These prophets are the following:
- Sheshbazzar in 538 BC: he led 1,000 Jews.
- Zerubbabel in 538 BC: he led 42,360 Jews.
- Ezra, in 458 BC: led 5000 Jews.
- Nehemiah in 445 BC: the number of Jew he led was unknown.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>Ezra</u>."
Learn more about Biblical Ezra here: brainly.com/question/20886374
I think the answer is because they didnt have a strong colony or and soldiers.
Answer:
Argument
Explanation:
Conclusion: "Citizens who so value their 'independence' that they will not enroll in a political party are really forfeiting independence.
Usually in an argument, the premise of an argument comes before the conclusion but in the case above the conclusion came before the supporting "evidence" in "because they abandon a share in decision-making at the primary level:the choice of the candidate."