All categories

3 years ago

Why does more think it is a Kings best interest to ensure the prosperity of his people

English

1 answer:

kramer3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

If a kings subjects are not living in prosperity, they can revolt and over through the king. If this happens( like it has numerously throughout history) they may revolt and overthrow the king altogether. If this happens then they may convert to democracy. The king has this in his best interest due to the fact if he does not he will have more problems within economy

Explanation: Hope this helps

You might be interested in

How could a baby fall out of a twenty-story building onto the ground and live?. Hint: It does not matter what the baby lands on,

ANTONII [103]

This is a very common IQ question. A baby can fall out of a twenty story building onto the ground and survive. The baby can fall out of the first floor window to survive. The questions never states what window the baby fell out of.

7 0

3 years ago

Based on the point and evidence, which is the best explanation, or analysis, of the evidence?

makvit [3.9K]

Answer: This suggests that the Mäori believe that teamwork helps family members achieve their goals.

Explanation:

In the Maori creation story, Ranginui (Rangi) who is the skymother and Papatuanuku (Papa) the skyfather, block the sun from their children as they are locked in procreative embrace.

Their children decide to separate them so that they may have light. Working together, they are able to accomplish the task thereby showing that with teamwork, family members can achieve their goals.

6 0

3 years ago

In the movie Everest ,this is my Question:Was Paul Romero right telling his son about the dangers of mountaineers? Explain from

NISA [10]

Answer:

The opening text to EVEREST explains the difficulty of climbing Mt. Everest but then talks about how expeditions are set up to held people reach the summit. This film tells the true story of one such expedition in 1996 where the climbers ran into a disastrous storm with tragic results.

EVEREST is a very grim, depressing and rather unpleasant movie that I really wish was better. I had high hopes going into the film but sadly there are all sorts of problems that overshadow what great qualities that are on display. I think the biggest problem is the opening hour where we get to know the characters and like a lot of the disaster movies from the 1970s these scenes are all too familiar and they really don't add much. I think the direction of Baltasar Kormakur could have handled these scenes much better or at least added a bit of energy to them.

The film kicks into high gear once the climb actually starts and once the storm hits. The greatest aspect to the film is the terrific cinematography, which is just downright beautiful and at times breath-taking. Even greater is the fact that it really does show you the dangers of making such a climb and I think the one thing the film does brilliantly is show you what a remarkable accomplishment it would be to reach the top of the mountain. I've seen several documentaries on Everest but this movie really does a remarkable job at showing how difficult the climb would be.

The performances are all very good. Jason Clarke, Jake Gyllenhaal, Emily Watson, Keira Knightley and Josh Brolin are all very good in their roles. All of the roles are rather small but it's easy to see what would attract them to such a project. The film also benefits from being technically very good with the score, the editing, sound effects and various other effects coming across quite good.

As I said, the first hour of the film is rather sluggish and I think the overall pacing is just off. The film features some intense scenes of action and peril but as I said the overall feel is just so depressing and unpleasant that I really wouldn't recommend the movie to people. I really wish the film was better but in the end it falls well short of being a good movie.

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

12. Juillet, even though young and innocent, is quite practical and reasonable. Discuss and explain examples of this in Acts 1 a

Crazy boy [7]

Answer:

In Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, the two lovers fall in love as very young. Juliet is only thirteen years old, while Romeo's age is not mentioned. We could, however, assume that Romeo is around her age.

Juliet is definitely more practical and mature, as she is aware that her whole life depends on her choices. At the time the play was written, women were in a far more difficult position, and were having a hard time to build a good reputation.

Juliet's practicality is obvious in Act II, Scene II, when Romeo wants to declare his love for her and swears by the moon. Juliet, however, protests by saying that the moon is always changing. She is hoping that, in their relationship, Romeo would not be as inconsistent as the moon. She states:

Do not swear at all.

Or, if thou wilt, swear by thy gracious self

My only love sprung from my only hate

Too early seen unknown, and known too late!

Juliet , therefore, advises Romeo not to swear by anything but himself.

6 0

3 years ago

How would you characterize, or describe, Harper lee

Dmitrij [34]

A sturdy woman who wanted to bring subtle awareness to everyday events people seem to ignore through literature knowing that it may destroy her image.

3 0

3 years ago