1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
finlep [7]
3 years ago
13

How was the Neolithic period different from the Paleolithic period?

History
1 answer:
kifflom [539]3 years ago
8 0

Option A is the right answer.

Began around 10,000 B.C, the Neolithic revolution in the history of Human marks the transition from small nomadic bands of hunter-gatherer to larger agricultural settlement and early civilization. People in the Paleolithic age used Primitive stone tools, whereas tools in the Neolithic era were more sophisticated. People during this age invented new types of tools such as sickle blades and stone axes etc. People in the Paleolithic age lived in small groups of 20- 30 people in caves, or in cabins made of tree branches, while, the Neolithic people with the advent of agriculture and raising cattle moved to  settle as the farmers and villagers.

You might be interested in
Explain one way in which exchange networks affected agriculture during the period 1200 - 1450.
LenKa [72]

Answer:

Unit 2: Networks of Exchange (c. 1200-1450):

Explanation:

Improved commercial practices led to an increased volume of trade and expanded the geographical range of existing trade routes—including the Silk Roads, trans-Saharan trade network, and Indian Ocean—promoting the growth of powerful new trading cities.

3 0
3 years ago
Athens is the city where democracy was born<br><br> True<br> True<br><br> False
vredina [299]

Answer TRUE

Explanation: ATHENIAN DEMOCRACY DEVELOPED AROUND THE FIFTH CENTURY B.C.E. THE GREEK IDEA OF DEMOCRACY WAS DIFFERENT FROM PRESENT DAY DEMOCRACY BECAUSE IN ATHENS ALL ADULT CITIZENS WERE REQUIRED TO TAKE AN ACTIVE PART IN THE GOVERNMENT.

6 0
3 years ago
Do the actions taken against the armenians seem like acceptable wartime actions?
Rashid [163]

Many countries around the world took different decisions during wartime. Some have been more brutal and difficult than we could have imagined. But in this situation that the Armenians faced, political events also had an effect. If you really want to get the right answer, you have to turn your perspective to both sides. Because both sides see themselves as justified in this event in history. And indeed, both sides have their faults and their justifications. In 1919, two American diplomats who wanted to investigate the event impartially visited the region. Their names were Emory Niles and Arthur Sutherland, and their view of the region was that both sides were right. Among the statements they wrote, it was written that the Armenians formed gangs against the Turks and plundered the Turkish villages in the region. But they also wrote that "Turkish soldiers were displaying a bad attitude towards Armenian civilians. According to the Turks, the reason for this was that the Armenians caused unrest in the region and took part in gang actions against the Turks. So the soldiers had to take control of the area. But when we look further into the past, we see that Armenians and Turks lived in peace in the empire. Even Armenian representatives took part in the Ottoman parliament in the 19th century. The reason why 2 communities that lived in harmony are so angry with each other is that foreign countries provoke the region to annex the region. We know that in the first world war, Russia wanted to invade the region. We also know that the Russians want to include the Orthodox Armenians in the region among themselves. It would not be difficult to conclude that the Russians formed gangs from the Armenians in the region and provoked them against the Kurdish and Turkish villages in the region. If this is indeed true, we would conclude that both parties are right in their own way.

7 0
2 years ago
During the First Crusade, the People's Crusade resulted in European forces:
viva [34]

Answer:c

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Why did railroads have a greater impact on American society than did canals and steamboats?
kobusy [5.1K]
<span>railroads cost less to build and trains provided faster transport.
: )
</span>
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In a command economy, decisions on what and how to produce, who to produce for, and what to do with profits is decided by
    7·1 answer
  • Was one of the goals of the United Nations in ww2 to prevent the spread of communism?
    13·1 answer
  • What agreement did the Sioux accept in return for peace under the fort laramie treaty of 1868?
    14·2 answers
  • When did Jane Herbert Wilkinson Long move to Waller County?
    11·2 answers
  • What brought britain and the united states to the brink of war in 1837?
    10·1 answer
  • Industrialization gave workers shorter working hours and time off on weekends wich allowed for
    15·1 answer
  • According to the article, why can struggles between Jews, Christians, and Muslims be considered “family feuds”
    13·1 answer
  • Guys i need help with this ! Thank you
    6·1 answer
  • The Declaration on tiberated Europe stated that
    14·1 answer
  • ASAP pls answer right and try to hurry
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!