Answer:
Stanford Prison.
Explanation:
This value was brought up to notice by Philip Zimbardo and some of his colleagues in the year 1973. They were interested in finding out whether the brutality reported among guards in American prisons was due to the sadistic personalities of the guards or had more to do with the prison environment.
Alternatively, prisoners and guards may behave in a hostile manner due to the rigid power structure of the social environment in prisons.
Answer:
The correct answer is A. The argument presupposes the conclusion for which it purports to provide evidence.
Explanation:
The idea in this question is to identify the most vulnerable argument, for which it is possible to conclude that The first argument is only base in the opinion of the theorists and critics and there is no clear evidence or facts to prove the statement. It only states because of someone's opinion “no aesthetic evaluation of a work of art is sound if it is based even in part on data about the cultural background of the artist” simply the argument is false. This results as a fallacy since it is an argument without evidence to show that it is valid.
Answer:
Observational method/Field experiment
Explanation:
A field experiment is conducted on a daily bases. In this field experiment, the experimenter still manipulates the independent variables.
But this happened only in real-life settings. In this experiment, the experimenter was not in that condition to control the extraneous variables. This experiment can conduct real life.
Thus Terence mentor recommends the observational method/field experiment.
Answer:
It was an important military strategy to control the Hudson river.
Explanation:
British Army wanted to divide rest of the states from New England. It would isolate New England this way.
New England was the center of the rebellion. Three British armies marched from "New York City, Montreal and Fort Oswego" and met in Albany. Then they seized Hudson River. It formed a natural obstruction along the western side of New England. The British were then able to move South and defeat the Southern colonies.
Thus, it was a very important and good military strategy.
