Federalists believe a strong central government is better than a stronger state government with a weak central government, like that in the Articles of Confederation.
One example of the weakness of the Articles of Confederation, and of weak central governments, is the strong likelihood of state secession, as states are essentially independent entities under the Articles of Confederation.
Another example would be that the Articles of Confederation serve more as a treaty between separate states than a constitution of a unified populace. The ability of states to govern their populace without influential federal interference or regulation basically means they can do whatever they choose.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the rise of the "proletariat," since Marx and his peers were highly against the consolidation of private wealth. </span></span>
Answer:
Under the Articles of Confederation, the power of the national government was exclusively centered in the Congress.
Explanation:
the answer is D, let me know if its the correct answer :)
