No, I believe that multiple weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation would have hurt America in time. One of the biggest problems was the lack of detail and specific attributes that the Constitution brings from long discussion and debates over what is best for the country. America needed to strengthen it's central government if it wanted to get anywhere, so we may not have become so powerful if we left the majority of the power in the state's hands. Another lacking component was the fact that we had no Executive branch to enforce Congress' laws and no National court to determine the meaning of the laws. Another example is the making of one currency for the entire country. These examples and more could have hurt America if they wouldn't have written the Constitution.
Answer:
-technological advance like Steam powered riverboats
-means to control disease
-they were no longer confined to the coast
During the 1780s, most state governments found it difficult to revise their constitutions.
<h3>What is Constitution?</h3>
It should be noted that Constitution simply means the principles of laws that guarantee the rights of the people.
In this case, during the 1780s, most state governments found it difficult to revise their constitutions.
Learn more about Constitution on:
brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ1
<h2>
<u>Answer:</u></h2>
<u>In 26th July 1956 Nationalisation ended in Europe. </u>
Answer:
It was larger and richer than any country in Europe.
Explanation:
It had sovereign powers. Which statement describes the Mughal Empire before 1700? It was larger and richer than any country in Europe.
