I think he was apart of only 1 organization which was the “Southern Christian Leadership Conference”
The Romans thought that it was important to have an emperor when there were provincial conflicts and wars along the frontiers.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Before becoming an empire, Rome was a Republic which was founded in 509 BCE. Rome represented a republic democracy and most of the wealthy families held power and the major offices in Rome. With the expansion of the territory and power of the Roman Republic, internal conflicts emerged when the citizens and the wealthy families struggled for power. Eventually civil wars broke out in the region and the people though that it was essential to have an emperor who would hold most of the power.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The above description contrast with early mining operations in the American West in that the formerly conditions of the old west were completely different than the "beautiful hills, waving fields of grass, prancing mule deer, a glimmering lake . . ." description by T.H. Watkins.
Indeed, it was the opposite. American settlers that decided to bet on the west and the "gold fever," found difficult conditions and economic hardships. That was not an easy time and required extra work to find the gold.
And let's have in mind that many people that went to the west were people that have been suffering from the difficult conditions in the Plains during the so-called "Dust Bowl" period in which drought and the lack of rain killed animals and affect the production of crops.
"Sumerian city-states fought each other" would be the best option from the list, since this internal division led to a collapse of power that left people without protection or a solid economy.
Wait what? What is this about lol
