The answer is B for this question
Dred Scott decision, formally Dred Scott v. John F.A. Sandford, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 6, 1857, ruled (7–2) that a slave (Dred Scott) who had resided in a free state and territory (where slavery was prohibited) was not thereby entitled to his freedom; that African Americans were not and could never be citizens of the United States; and that the Missouri Compromise (1820), which had declared free all territories west of Missouri and north of latitude 36°30′, was unconstitutional. The decision added fuel to the sectional controversy and pushed the country closer to civil war.
-4.4
HOPE THIS HELPS fsdblbdfjee
The fact that the Jaqces carter's by no means lower back to North America, different Europeans got here to recognize their accomplishments. Europe, however, was made of many small principalities whose issues have been especially nearby. Europeans might also have been intrigued by the memories of the feared Vikings’ discovery of a new international, but they lacked the assets or the will to observe their course of exploration.
The Reformation, the Renaissance, and New trade Routes between one thousand and one thousand six hundred fifty, a sequence of interconnected developments passed off in Europe that provided the impetus for the exploration and subsequent colonization of America. those developments blanketed the Protestant Reformation and the following Catholic Counter-Reformation, the Renaissance, and the unification of small states into larger ones with centralized political power.
The emergence of a recent generation in navigation and shipbuilding, the status quo of overland alternate with the East, and the accompanying transformation of the medieval economic system. The Protestant Reformation and the Catholic Church’s response to the Counter-Reformation marked the stop of several centuries of gradual erosion of the power of the Catholic Church in addition to the climax of internal attempts to reform the Church. Protestantism emphasized personal courting between each person and God without the need for intercession by using the institutional church.
Learn more about Explored North America here:-brainly.com/question/26966746
#SPJ4
Answer:
Subjective is biased thinking, objective is factual thinking.
Explanation:
Subjective thinking is usually based on one's personal choices, judgment, and opinions. Objective thinking is based on facts, observations, and measurements.
