According to institutional liberal perspective, international migration can be a positive development for both rich and poor nations if it is comprehensive and coordinated.
International migration is the movement of people across the international borders i.e. from one country to another country. It can be either immigration (moving into one country) or emigration (moving out of one country).
If the migration is done in comprehensive and coordinated manner it can be beneficial for both rich and poor nations. The rich nations will receive human capital as the working population immigrates to their country for jobs and the poor country can also benefit from the remittances from the emigrants.
To learn more about International migration here
brainly.com/question/17991559
#SPJ4
An embassy promotes its home culture and economy in the hosts country.
Explanation:
1.government policies and rules should act strong and proper visualization should be done.
2.Awareness and development of people's mind should be there by conducting informal education.
<em>Keep</em><em> </em><em>smiling </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>hope</em><em> </em><em>u</em><em> </em><em>are</em><em> </em><em>satisfied </em><em>with</em><em> </em><em>my</em><em> </em><em>answer</em><em>.</em><em>Have</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>nice</em><em> </em><em>day</em><em> </em><em>:</em><em>)</em>
Ruling out rival hypotheses, Findings consistent with several hypotheses
require additional research to eliminate these hypotheses. More five principles
of critical thinking are: (1.) Correlation vs. Causation, the fact that two
things are associated with each other doesn’t mean that one causes the other.
(2.) Replicability, a finding must be capable of being duplicated by
independent researchers following the same recipe. (3.) Occam’s Razor,
if two hypotheses explain a phenomenon equally well, we should generally select
the simpler one. (4.) Falsifiability, claims
must be capable of being disproved. (5.) Extraordinary Claims, the more a
claim contradicts what we already know, the more persuasive the evidence must
be before we should accept it.
Answer:
Some people don't like it and some ppl do
