I believe the answer is: <span>Once he eats, he has to go outside and patrol the backyard.”
Since the article is about various dog breeds, the writer should avoid mentioning anything specific about the dog species or personal trainer experiences. From the options above, only this line could explain dog behaviors in general.</span><span />
Answer:
"Mixed" will be the correct answer.
Explanation:
When you're in a manic or depressive condition with mixed characteristics, you'll have satisfied the accurate test requirements for a previous psychotic phase and therefore will have encountered at least 2 or 3 signs of distress for much of the similar given timeframe:
- A residual perception of sorrow or silence.
-
A lack of interest and perhaps satisfaction in things you particularly enjoy.
-
Speech or answer quite frequently than expected.
Perhaps Joshua's having a psychotic episode containing mixed characteristics.
The direct democracy or pure democracy it´s a form of democracy in which the people directly decides on policy initiatives, it differs from the representative democracy; the one that it´s currently established in the majority of the countries; because in that the people choose the representantives and they are those who decide the policies to carry on. In the representative democracy the people do not govern, it´s a common mistake to mix both concepts.
Two different forms of direct democracy are participatory democracy and deliberative democracy. The deliberative democracy is a form in which the deliberation it´s a central matter to the decisions and it is seen as an amalgalm of the direct and the representative democracies. It holds that for a democratic decision to be legitimate, it must be preceded by an authentic deliberation not a mere voting.
The participatory democracy is one that emphasizes the broad participation of everybody but it demands to the citizens to be more involved in the political participation.
I think that a group taking a vote on something is an example of a participatory democracy because everyone have the same power to create consensus and, at last it would win the iniciative that obtain more votes. If the example was a representative democracy then the group would have to vote for only one person to make a decision and then the group will follow the "leader" choice althought it goes against the majority of what the group wants.
I hope the answer to be useful for you. Regards.
The correct answer is the behavioral <span>component of adolescent autonomy.
The behavioral component of adolescent autonomy simply involves the ability and practice of making one's own decisions and choices independently. When making autonomous decisions, adolescents might consult others for their opinions and inputs, however adolescents ultimately make a final decision independently. Other components of adolescent autonomy besides the behavioral component include the emotional and cognitive components. </span>
