The statement best evaluates the effectiveness of the evidence in the text is the argument is convincing because the authors use varied forms of relevant evidence, including well-researched studies and verifiable data.
<h3>What is social media?</h3>
Social media is a group of websites that have applications that use in interaction between people virtually
The options are attached:
- The argument is convincing because the authors use varied forms of relevant evidence, including well-researched studies and verifiable data.
- The argument is convincing because the authors use varied forms of relevant evidence, including eyewitness accounts and personal anecdotes.
- The argument is not convincing because the authors support their points only with their own opinions, which is not sufficient evidence to support the claim.
- The argument is not convincing because the authors focus only on facts and data related to bit .ly links and usage, which is not sufficient evidence to support the claim.
Thus, the correct option is 1.
Learn more about social media
brainly.com/question/9564823
#SPJ1
Its b,In a democracy, it is a duty and privilege to vote for governmental leaders.
Answer:
theres no option
Explanation:
nor choice
or anything?
chapter 2 of what?
uhm.... be more specific next time.
Answer:
Francois
Explanation:
In "The Call of the Wild", a group of people comes together to search for adventure and riches in Canada. To this end, they hire a sled-team with dogs to guide them through the jungle.
Hal is described as an inexperienced and bad man who just wants to find treasure, without caring for the people around him, or the dogs.
Francois is the direct opposite of Hal because he is described as a fair and experienced man who knows the ways of the wild and cares about the people and dogs around him
I think it true
i dont really know but im sure
