Answer:
Case-Control Study
Explanation:
A case–control study is a type of observational study in which two existing groups differing in outcome are identified and compared on the basis of some supposed causal attribute
The correct options are as follows;
1. DIRECT.
Supply refers to the quantity of a product that a producer is willing to bring to the market. The higher the price of the product in the market, the more the producer will be willing to produce more product. For instance, if a product is been sold for $20 in the market and the price now increase to $50, the producer will prefer to produce more of that product in order to increase his profits, he will not be willing to produce another product that its price is lesser than $50. Thus, the higher the price, the more the quantity supplied; this shows a direct relation between price and quantity supplied.
2. UPWARD SLOPING.
The supply curve is a graphical representation that shows the relationship that exist between the price of a commodity and the quantity the supplier is willing to supply. The graph move upward from left to right [Upward sloping], thus showing that as the price is increasing, the quantity supply too will increase.
Answer:
Migration is important for the transfer of manpower and skills and provides the needed knowledge and innovation for global growth. In order to address the issues raised by global migration, it is necessary to improve international coordination.
Hope it helps....
Answer: A. True
Explanation:
The basic principle associated with the economics is that the goods, products, and services are limited and demand increases considerably to produce them. The resources used for the production also increases considerably. The scarcity principle of economics deals with the limited supply of the goods that is coupled with the increase in demand this results in the mismatch between the demand equilibrium and desired supply.
Answer:
Social responsibility is an ethical framework and suggests that an entity, be it an organization or individual, has an obligation to act for the benefit of society at large.[citation needed] Social responsibility is a duty every individual has to perform so as to maintain a balance between the economy and the ecosystems. A trade-off may exist between economic development, in the material sense, and the welfare of the society and environment,[1] though this has been challenged by many reports over the past decade.[when?][2][3] Social responsibility means sustaining the equilibrium between the two. It pertains not only to business organizations but also to everyone whose any action impacts the environment.[4] This responsibility can be passive, by avoiding engaging in socially harmful acts, or active, by performing activities that directly advance social goals. Social responsibility must be intergenerational since the actions of one generation have consequences on those following.[5]
Businesses can use ethical decision making to secure their businesses by making decisions that allow for government agencies to minimize their involvement with the corporation.[6] For instance if a company follows the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines for emissions on dangerous pollutants and even goes an extra step to get involved in the community and address those concerns that the public might have; they would be less likely to have the EPA investigate them for environmental concerns.[7] "A significant element of current thinking about privacy, however, stresses "self-regulation" rather than market or government mechanisms for protecting personal information".[8] According to some experts, most rules and regulations are formed due to public outcry, which threatens profit maximization and therefore the well-being of the shareholder, and that if there is not an outcry there often will be limited regulation.[9]
Some critics argue that corporate social responsibility (CSR) distracts from the fundamental economic role of businesses; others argue that it is nothing more than superficial window-dressing, or "greenwashing";[10] others argue that it is an attempt to pre-empt the role of governments as a watchdog over powerful corporations though there is no systematic evidence to support these criticisms. A significant number of studies have shown no negative influence on shareholder results from CSR but rather a slightly negative correlation with improved shareholder returns.[11]
Explanation:
plzz mark me as brainlist
