1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Karolina [17]
4 years ago
15

What resulted from the signing of the Four-Power Treaty

History
2 answers:
Tom [10]4 years ago
8 0
Correct answer is answer A.
Cerrena [4.2K]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

A The United States agreed not to seek further territorial expansion in the Pacific.

Explanation:

The Treaty of the Four Powers was an agreement signed by the United States, the United Kingdom, France and Japan during the Naval Conference of Washington on December 13, 1921, following the Lansing-Ishii Agreement between the United States and Japan.

Under the pact of the four powers, the parties agreed to maintain the status quo in the Pacific, to respect the respective territorial possessions, not to try to expand territorially and to consult each other in the case of differences over territorial possessions. However, the main result of the treaty was to end the Anglo-Japanese alliance of 1902.

You might be interested in
Which of the following is a true statement about early American cultures?
lara [203]
I think that it is c but not all the way shore
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help! 12 Points! I'll give Brainliest!
Bad White [126]

The believe that the answer is that they were all patriots who helped spark the American Revolution. They weren't all presidents, they didn't found the colonies, and not all of them were military leaders.

6 0
3 years ago
What did the Indian removal act allow the federal government to do?​
marshall27 [118]

The Indian Removal Act allowed the government to control most of the Indians' life such as land, resources and etc.

4 0
3 years ago
Important events of the holocaust
Nady [450]

i guess u could say they killing of the jews

8 0
4 years ago
Why did the Emancipation Proclamation free slaves only in Confederate states? A President Lincoln did not have the authority to
vredina [299]


I think D: Northern legislatures had already passed the Emancipation Proclamation is your best bet. Lincoln didn't have the right to give the executive order in the states that had congressional representation which was strictly the Union . However, in the rebellious states (the south) he was able to impose his authority over them because they were technically looked at as having committed treason against the Union. Does that make sense?

Hopefully this helped and good luck.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • List three characteristics of Tenochtitlan that Cortés admired.
    15·1 answer
  • Which part of Russia has the highest population density
    13·1 answer
  • . Number the events in chronological order. ______The Aztecs expanded their empire. ______ Montezuma takes the throne. ______ Co
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the 1957 events at Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas?
    6·1 answer
  • Who was the Boston lawyer who opposed the writs of assistance
    8·1 answer
  • Here is the 3 choices of the question. What are the author’s of the battle at Antietam
    11·1 answer
  • Why did many americans criticize TARP?
    12·1 answer
  • Why shouldn’t illegal immigrants receive government benefits
    9·1 answer
  • Who took the Kingdom of Cuzco and made it into what would become known as the Inca Empire?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of these was MOST responsible for Napoleon's defeat in Russia?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!