Answer:
B. The verbal dispute between the characters gives the man the opportunity to explain his experiences to Dr. Frankenstein
Explanation:
According to the passage, the characters advance the plot by relating their experiences to Dr. Frankenstein. This is made possible because of their verbal disputes which let's them to air their views and opinions.
Answer:
they choose their occupations for them
none of them have memories of sunlight and animals because the giver has them and there isn't anything else in the city
they aren't allowed out of the city and if they tried to escape they try to kill them
Answer:
The main character in the story
Explanation:
The protagonist is a the "good guy" of the story. Most of the time, these protagonists are the main character.
the answer isn't synonym I think it might be either example or explanation but I took the test and put synonym and it was wrong
Sin or public health taxes are excise taxes imposed on the consumption of potentially harmful goods for health [sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), tobacco, alcohol, among others], aiming to reduce consumption, raise additional revenue and/or improve population health. This paper assesses the extent to which sin taxes (a) can reduce consumption of potentially harmful goods, (b) raise revenue for national health systems and (c) contribute to population health in Latin America. A systematic literature review was conducted on peer-reviewed and grey literature; endpoints included: impact of raising sin taxes on consumption, ability to raise revenue for health and the possibility of population health improvements. Risk of bias for each study was assessed. The synthesis of the literature on sin tax implementation showed improvements in all three endpoints across the study countries. Following the introduction of sin taxes or by simulating their potential impact, nearly all studies explicitly reported that consumption of potentially harmful goods (mainly SSBs and tobacco) declined; revenue was found to have increased in almost all countries, suggesting that there may be additional scope for further tax increase. Simulated improvements in population health have also been shown, by demonstrating a relationship between sin tax increases and reduction in prevalence of diabetes, stroke, heart attacks and associated deaths. However, sin tax effects on health would be better quantified over the long-term. Data quality and availability challenges did place some limitations on sin tax impact assessment. Sin taxes can be effective in reducing consumption of potentially harmful goods, improve population health and generate additional revenue. Promoting further research on this topic should be a priority.
