Answer: D) Fewer; More
Explanation:
Compared with Gardner, Sternberg has identified fewer independent dimensions of intelligence and his forms of intelligence have been more reliably measured. Sternberg presented his theory of intelligence where he suggested various forms of intelligence present in the human beings which includes analytical, practical and distinct type of intelligence. He further came up with the logic of being creative and innovative. Besides proposing this theory, he also proposed theory of love as well by presenting some factors to measure ans show love. Whereas, Gardner also proposed intelligence theory where he came up with multiple forms of human intelligence. If we compare both of them, we will come to know Strindberg has certainly found less independent dimension of human intelligence as compared to Gardner but the factors proposed by Sternberg were ore accurate and truly valid when it comes to the practical intelligence which further was proved and supported by later studies and researches.
1)The pharaoh was both the ruler and the god incarnate, the ancient Egyptians believed that by disobeying him, they could cause him to be angry and summon droughts or floods, or even plague.
2)Bureaucracy is not a modern invention; it was
conceived by the Egyptians over 5,000 years ago. The creation of a
bureaucracy in the Old Kingdom was a
key factor in the inception of the Egyptian civilization. The
king was the supreme head
of state. Next to him, the most powerful officer in the hierarchy was
the vizier,
the executive head of the
bureaucracy.
The position of vizier was filled by a
prince
or a person of exceptional ability. His title
is translated as "superintendent of all works of the king".
As the supreme judge of the state, the vizier
ruled on all petitions and grievances brought to the court. All royal
commands passed through his hands before being transmitted to the
scribes in his office. They in turn dispatched orders to the heads
of distant towns and villages, and dictated the rules and
regulations related to the collection of
taxes.
The king was surrounded by the court, friends
and favoured people who attained higher administrative positions. The
tendency was to fill these positions on the basis of heredity. One of
the most ardent wishes of these administrators was to climb the
bureaucratic ladder through promotions and to hand their offices to
their children.M<span>any concepts in modern bureaucracies can be
traced to the Egyptians. The hierarchical structure and code of ethics
of the Egyptian bureaucracy are echoed in modern governments. Ancient
Egyptian bureaucrats, who aspired to higher positions, were counselled
to obey their superiors and keep silence in all circumstances, in
other words, not to contradict or challenge the wisdom of those in
charge. They were expected to have tact and good manners, be faithful
in delivering messages, and display humility that verged on
subservience. It is perhaps for these reasons that Egyptian officials
were called civil servants, a designation that governments have adopted
down through the ages. </span>
3)the Egyptians were polytheists, they believed in many gods, from Ra, the king of the gods, to minor river gods
Answer:
B. Investments in stocks have the possibility of losing money
Explanation:
In economics, a service is a transaction in which no physical goods are transferred from the seller to the buyer. ... Using resources, skill, ingenuity, and experience, service providers benefit service consumers. Service is intangible in nature.
A command economy is when government central planners own or control the means of production, and determine the distribution of output.
Command economies suffer from problems with poor incentives for planners, managers, and workers in state-owned enterprises.
Central planners in a command economy are unable to rationally determine the methods, quantities, proportions, location, and timing of economic activity across an economy without private property or the operation of supply and demand.
