Answer: Repentance
Explanation: Expressed publicly, this act of speech can be seen as an act of weakness or, conversely, as an act of strenght that exalts the image of the issuer, far from reducing it. It would then be a statement that contains three speech acts: the act of recognition of the fault, that of the proposal for reparation and the act of bravery that emerges from the public recongition of the lack of the politician´s regret is considered a discursive strategy of power that allows you to rehabilitate your image. In its strategic elaboration, the politician tries to appear sincere while mitigating or justifying the importance of the fault.
It announced you are going to send the money back for the day and send money back to you my money back is fine I don’t have money
Answer:
Historically, personality psychologists have concentrated on effect size to evaluate the effects of personality variables, whereas social psychologists have concen-trated on statistical significance to evaluate the effects of situational variables.
Explanation:
Personality Psychology is the area that studies and seeks to explain the human particularities that influence behavior. In these branches personality psychologists used to define personality as the set of characteristics that determine a person's personal and social patterns; their formation is a gradual, complex and unique process for each individual. In addition, personality psychologists focused on effect size to assess the effects of personality variables.
On the other hand, social psychology addresses the relationships between members of a social group, so it is on the borderline between psychology and sociology. It seeks to understand how man behaves in his social interactions. Social psychologists seek to understand the degrees of connection between being and the society to which it belongs, deconstructing the image of an individual opposed to the social group. These professionals focused on statistical significance to assess the effects of situational variables.
Answer:
d). deductive, valid, unsound
Explanation:
A deductive argument refers to an argument which is 
that is to be 
, i.e., to provide guarantee of the truth of the conclusion provided.
When all the premises of an argument are true, then it is called a valid argument.
When an argument is either valid or invalid having at least one false premises, then it is unsound.
Thus in the context, the argument is deductive, valid and an unsound argument.
Hence the correct option is (d).
This is of course a very complex question that does not have a definitive answer, but 1850s would be a good decade to start counting as "Modern". This was a decade of the telegraph and Darwin's The Origin of Species.
<span />
