Answer:
Negative NPV.
Explanation:
present value of cost exceeds present value of revenue that is been assumed in the investment plan of the said company/firm.
Net Present Value describes one of the discounted techniques of cash flow used in capital budget to determining the viability of a project or an investment. It is seen to have a huge difference between the present flow of the firms; which is cash inflows and the present value of cash outflows over a period of time. Experts has tagged its primary advantage to be that it is seen to considers the concept of the time value of money.
Answer: Sales orientation
Explanation:
A firm that makes use sales orientation is focused on making its products and services very good and affordable. When a sales orientation strategy is adopted, the goal is to sell many goods and services without the firm worrying about marketing to its target audience.
The idea is that by making a product or service that is superior and being sold at the right price, which is combined with aggressive sales tactics, firms can convince people to purchase whatever they are selling. With the explanation, we can infer that the company Harvey works for uses a sales orientation.
Answer:
B. $9,957.
Explanation:
The computation is adjusted amount for Uncollectible account expense is shown below:
= The estimated total uncollectible accounts + debit balance of Allowance for uncollectible accounts
= $7,322 + $2,635
= $9,957
For computing the adjusted amount we added the estimated total uncollectible accounts and the debit balance of Allowance for uncollectible accounts
If Daniel took the cash, he could be found guilty of the crime of embezzlement. Embezzlement is a specific type of theft. It is when someone was entrusted with someone else's property (like an employer) and they steal some/all for their personal benefit.
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
The total amount of cost that will be allocated from S2 to Department A is $32,200.
Explanation:
This can be calculated as follows:
Cost allocated from Department S1 to Department S2 = Direct department costs of Department S1 * Percentage of service to Department S2 = $200,000 * 15% = $30,000
Total Direct department costs for S2 = Direct department costs for S2 + Cost allocated from Department S1 to Department S2 = $16,000 + $30,000 = $46,000
Cost allocated from Department S2 to Department SA = Total direct department costs for S2 * Percentage of service to Department A = $46,000 * 70% = $32,200
Therefore, the total amount of cost that will be allocated from S2 to Department A is $32,200.
