Answer:
spending would increase
Explanation:
Disposable income is either saved (invested) or spent.
If stock prices are expected to fall, individuals would be less willing to save their income and would prefer to spend their income instead.
As a result, spending would increase
Answer:
Part a: The probability of breaking even in 6 tosses is 0.3125.
Part b: The probability that one payer wins all the money after the 10th toss is 0.0264.
Explanation:
Part a
P(success)=1/2=0.5
P(Failure)=1/2=0.5
Now for the break-even at the sixth toss
P(Break Even)=P(3 success out of 6)
P(3 success out of 6)

So the probability of breaking even in 6 tosses is 0.3125.
Part b:
So the probability that one of the player wins all the money after the 10th toss is given as the tenth toss is given as a win so
Wins in 9 tosses is given as 9!/7!=72
The probability that the other person wins
Wins in 8 out of 10 tosses is given as 10!/8!(10-8)!=10!/8!2!=45
So the probability of all the money is won by one of the gambler after the 10th toss is given as
P=number of wins in 9 tosses-Number of wins in 10 tosses/total number of tosses
P=(72-45)/2^16
P=0.0264
So the probability that one payer wins all the money after the 10th toss is 0.0264.
<span>Taurus's employer must record $60.76 for unemployment compensation because his yearly pay has not yet exceeded the $7,000 cap. Taurus's oasdi tax would be $60.76 and the medicare tax total is $14.21. The total payroll tax expenses for Taurus's employer to pay is $135.73.</span>
Answer:
No, Jim is not correct.
Explanation:
Betty will win this case.
Generally, the law encourages marriage as its policy. If there is any contract that prevent or restrict marriage in whatever way, such contract would be considered null and void because it is against the public policy.
Despite the above, contracts will be generally considered valid when they place reasonable restrictions on marriage. In this question, the restriction placed on Betty that she should get married until after her 22nd birthday is reasonable and has to be considered to be valid. Based on this, Betty has to be paid the $25,000 as laid down in the binding contract between the two parties.
Therefore, Jim is not correct.