Just don't drink ;)
That will prevent intoxication
        
                    
             
        
        
        
The Stackelberg solution can be used to find the perfect or stable Nash equilibrium or equilibria.
<h3>What is this equilibrium about?</h3>
Other answers:
Based on the above, Note that the strategy profile is one where one serves best each player, and based on the strategies of the other player and it covers the fact that all player playing in a Nash equilibrium must be in every subgame.
Note also that The Stackelberg leadership model is said to be a kind off strategic game  that is played in economics where the leader firm is known to moves first and then the follower firms is said to then move in a sequential manner and I think, the solution do not change if stackelberg game is considered in the long run.
I believe that the stackelberg leader will not collude with the stackelberg follower but in a lot of cases, there may be a collusion.
Yes, a Stackelberg leader can be more likely or less likely to merge with the follower firm as a merger can be profitable to them.
Learn more about equilibrium from
brainly.com/question/517289
#SPJ1
 
        
             
        
        
        
Im guess it would be 20,000 but im not positive
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
higher unemployment rate
Explanation:
The economic region, A, where there is the presence of strict union protection laws, is most likely to experience increase unemployment rate compared to region B where there is the absence of strict union protection laws. 
Unions most times favor those who are currently employed as opposed to those who are searching for jobs. They try to reduce wage inequality between low and middle wage workers and high- wage workers, this most times leads to increase in wages above the equilibrium level. This further result to the decline of amount of labor required hence leading to unemployment.
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The answer is: E) workers in Alzania have higher productivity due to better education and training.
Explanation:
Alzania and its neighbor both produce cotton and they both have the same amount of workers in the production of cotton. If Alzania is able to produce more cotton (or any type of product) using the same amount of resources (in this case labor) than its neighbor, we can conclude that Alzania does have an absolute advantage in that industry. 
This absolute advantage exists because Alzania's workers are more productive than their neighbor's workers. 
For example, lets say both countries have 5,000 cotton workers. Alzania produces 100 tons of cotton per worker, while its neighbor only produces 80 tons of cotton per worker. That means Alzania's workers are more productive, and labor usually gains productivity through education or training.