The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You did not include the effects of globalization referred to in your question. However, we can answer in general terms.
Some effects of globalization that would be presented as evidence by either critics or proponents of globalization would be the following.
Proponents: globalization connects nations through trade. Allow the increasing of "healthy" competition. Globalization can positively influence other cultures. Create jobs in foreign countries.
Critics: undeveloped worlds are in clear trade disadvantaged against powerful nations. Many jobs are lost in former countries because industries and fabrics close to open them in underdeveloped countries where labor is cheaper. Globalization imposes new forms of thinking that messes with local cultures. Traditions of these local cultures tend to be forgotten due to the influence of consumerism and western culture.
Answer:
The Anti-Federalists argued against the expansion of national power. They favored small localized governments with limited national authority as was exercised under the Articles of Confederation. ... Therefore, only a confederacy of the individual states could protect the nation's liberty and freedom.
1.d. 85%
2.c.Legislators believe that undocumented immigrants should never gain citizenship
3.b.new Mexicans want the state to have more people than Arizona
Answer:
Sam Houston was enlisted himself in the army to keep peace between the Natives and Texans. The correct answer is C.
Explanation:
- Sam Houston was one of the great leader and political figure of the Texas during 19th century.
- He had became the first president of the Republic of Texas in 1836. He had became active in keeping peace between various tribes of Indian territory. He was active in handling the Indian affairs.
- He was involved in the protest of the government treatment of Native Americans. After then he was sent to negotiate treaties with local Native Americans for protection of border traders.