All categories

2 years ago

Federal forts in the Southern states were owned by

Social Studies

2 answers:

Vladimir79 [104]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

the Union.

Explanation:

As we know, the Northern United States (union) was characterized by its manufacturing development, with the existence of small agricultural properties, in which there was a predominance of free wage labor. The South, on the other hand, was characterized by the plantation system, that is, the large property with the monoculture based on African slave labor.

The union had a much greater industrial strength than the Confederates and this reflected a lot in the secession war. In addition, the union had federal forts in the southern states, in addition to those established in the northern states. This allowed the union to have a strong defense and to advance in the conquest of the territory.

TiliK225 [7]2 years ago

5 0

The federal forts in the southern states were owned by The Union (B)

You might be interested in

Whenever Tommy has a babysitter and asks to stay up past his bedtime, the babysitter lets him. Whenever Tommy asks his parents t

xxTIMURxx [149]

Answer:

discriminative stimulus

Explanation:

In psychology, the discriminative stimulus is determined as one of the precursor stimuli that is supposed to have a stimulus control over a specific behavior due to the fact that the behavior was formerly reinforced in the presence of that particular stimulus in the past. In other words, it tends to set the event for specific behaviors that have already been reinforced in its presence in the "past".

As per the question, the mentioned statement represents the discriminative stimulus.

3 0

3 years ago

What are some benefits AND potential problems with using the dynasty system as a form of government?

maxonik [38]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.

Some benefits and potential problems with using the dynasty system as a form of government are the following.

A benefit of the Dynasty system as a form of government is that it helps to create the continuity needed for rulers to really establish the foundation of a long term government that could benefit the citizens through the pass of time. If the government results in having good rulers, the benefits for all last many years.

On the other hand, the potential problem is that a bad ruler in a dynasty can turn into a dictator that oppresses the citizens and charge them taxations and commit injustices. If its foreign policy is expansionist, war and conquest would be the constant of the dynasty, generating pain, suffering to the empire, and deep debt due to the war.

Both examples can be seen in the dynasties of Ancient Egypt and Ancient China.

4 0

3 years ago

In order to better respond to international conflicts, the united states should significantly increase its military spending. Tr

Luden [163]

Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
The statement "In order to better respond to international conflicts, the united states should significantly increase its military spending." is true

3 0

2 years ago

The game was first named "Jeu de Paume" which meant "game of the hand" True False

yarga [219]

False it makes more sense

3 0

3 years ago

Naia is a vegan. Jeff thinks that all vegans are "treehuggers" who choose to be vegan because they are protesting for animal rig

bezimeni [28]

Jeff's ideas are because of his Percival bias.

Explanation:

Jeff has a predisposition bias against vegans because he associates them with a certain ind of habits that is the tree hugging and many such movements that he obviously has a negative view about.

Thus, even when a person is vegan because they have no other choice but to be one they are still laying the same negative stereotypes on them.

This is the predisposed bias that he transfers onto another person who broadly fits that category in his head.

4 0

3 years ago