Question

PLEASE ANSWER NOW!!!! THANKS

Answer 1

The correct answer is option four. Sophie supports her interpretation that Queen Elizabeth is annoyed by quoting what she has said or written. As a result, Sophie demonstrates evidence that backs her assumption - nothing less that Elizabeth's actual words.

Answer 2

Using textual evidence to support her inference.

Further Explanation:

In the above-mentioned stanza, from Sophie’s paper on Response to Erik of Sweden says that this letter is truly yours both in the writing and sentiment and that letter was given to Sophie on 30th December by her brother who was the Duke of Finland. It can be perceived from the letter that Zeal and love of one’s mind towards other cannot be diminished and yet in part, we are grieved that we can’t gratify your Serene Highness with the same type of affection and that indeed does not happens because we doubt in any way of your honor and love but many times, it has been testified by us in both written form as well as by spoken words and we have never yet conceived a feeling of that kind of affection towards anyone.  

Learn More:

1. What is the connection between crime and unequal access to basic services explain at least four

brainly.com/question/1618434

2. How did Gertrude stein influence the career of Pablo Picasso in Paris at the start of the twentieth century?

brainly.com/question/4845016

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: Response to Erik of Sweden

Subject: English

Keywords: Erik of Sweden, Sophie, Brother, Duke, Finland, Affection, Written Form, Spoken Words, Testified, Honour.