1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Masja [62]
4 years ago
11

One result of American imperialism is that many developing nations became "banana republics." A banana republic was a nation

History
1 answer:
lozanna [386]4 years ago
8 0
A banana republic is a name for a Latin American nation (generally Central American or Carribean) that was under intense U.S. influence.  The term originally comes from Nicaragua when the United Fruit Company (now Chiquita Bananas) had their banana plantation seized by the Nicaraguan government, outraged by this seizure of their massive plantation the United Fruit Company lobbied to United States government to act; the United States government agreed to act for the United Fruit Company and landed Marines in Nicaragua forcing the government to return the land to the United Fruit Company and pay reparation to both the United Fruit Company and United States government,  In general, a banana republic was a nation under extreme U.S. influence that exported its natural resources, usually fruits, to the United States.  As a result, most of these nations became dependent on the United States for economic support and several dictators came to power during this period (notably in the Dominican Republic) with U.S. backing.  The period in which banana republics are said to have existed is generally the 1890's to the 1930's.  Corporations, such as the United Fruit Company, also exercised heavy influence on the governments of Latin America and the U.S. government as well.
You might be interested in
Choose the word that best completes each sentence.
vitfil [10]

Answer:

When Carter took office, he first tried to increase growth by proposing A(higher) government spending.

Then, Carter tried solve the problem of B(inflation) by reducing the number of business rules.

In the end, inflation continued to C(rise) .

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the primary purpose of this poster?
nikklg [1K]

Answer:

B. To protest the conflict in Vietnam

Explanation:

Many Americans opposed engagement in Vietnam and several hosted anti-war rallies to show their opinion, such rallies were often covered by bands who shared such views.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2 Points
damaskus [11]
The correct one is B
8 0
3 years ago
Young people have historically failed to participate in the election process - fewer young people vote than those of other age g
Nikolay [14]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Indeed, young people have historically failed to participate in the election process - fewer young people vote than those of other age groups.

I think this occurs because young people feel there is a lot of corruption and lies in the political system, and that politicians do not act with integrity.

Many youngsters notice how legislators endlessly argue with each other in the House of Representatives and the Senate, or how is the relationship between the executive branch and the legislative branch. And they don't like what they see. They turn to the other side

How does this negatively impact democracy in the US?

Of course, that behavior is not good because youngsters are the next generation that is going to run the United States.

They have to be prepared, informed, ready to fill the highest political spots and corporative spots to take the US into the next decade. And if they are not informed and actively participate in politics, it is going to be difficult for them to understand what the country needs to move forward.

7 0
3 years ago
If there was no civil war, would America still have slavery?
Tems11 [23]

This is one of those questions that is near impossible to answer.

The best I can give you, based upon my reading, is that it is likely that slavery would have continued for quite a while longer. Over time, though, it would have held a diminished role in society as the South industrialized. The advent of the assembly line would have further pushed the decline.

Holding slaves was a morally bankrupt AND expensive endeavor. For a long time, the cost benefit analysis for slave owners was that they could get years of work out of a person without wages. Eventually, with technology, this would have made the institution less of a good "investment," combined with moral pressure as most of the Western world divested itself from slavery.

So, you'd likely see a more pronounced version of our de facto slavery with migrant farm workers in the United States.

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • HELP FAST!!! 20 POINTS
    14·1 answer
  • During the cost to Shannoah convention which would have given is the most populated states more power A) Shays rebellion B)is th
    10·2 answers
  • How did the war effort between 1941 and 1945 affect the u.s. standard of living?
    8·1 answer
  • Why did the world economy depend on the strength of the U.S. economy in the 1920s
    14·2 answers
  • How did the united states ready its military, economy, and people for war?
    12·1 answer
  • Which 1917 revolution resulted in Vladimir Lenin becoming the head of the Russian Republic?
    14·1 answer
  • What does it mean that the rights in the First Amendment are not absolute?
    15·1 answer
  • Read the passage from "The Maori: Genealogies and Origins in New Zealand.” In his anger, Tû chopped down the forests to find Tân
    10·2 answers
  • What did delegates for stronger state governments (weaker national government) believe?
    5·1 answer
  • Around 200 A.D. Nubia fell into what Afrian kingdom?​
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!