Answer:
Both low price and high quality.
Explanation:
The characteristics that make a product or service have a perceived value for the consumer, are the various functionalities and benefits that satisfy the needs and desires of the customer. Such benefits are independent of the price of the product or quality, since value is a set of rational or irrational attributes that the consumer perceives, such as the brand image, experience, functionality, product benefits, etc.
Value creation is variable for each consumer group, as each person perceives value as a set of specific attributes that satisfy their desires, so it is not possible to classify low price or high quality as value determinants, as these characteristics change according to the consumer's style.
Therefore, for a company to deliver value to the consumer, it is essential that it conducts segmentation studies and identification of its target audience and from there develop strategies aimed at creating value for its audience.
Answer:
- after-tax average annual return = 14.41%
- after tax dividends per year = $38.88
Explanation:
initial investment = 30 shares x $72.49 per share = $2,174.70
- dividends received per year = 30 shares x $0.36 x 4 (dividends paid every quarter) = $43.20
after tax dividends per year = $43.20 x 90% = $38.88
- long term capital gains = (30 shares x $183 per share) - initial investment = $5,490 - $2,174.70 = $3,315.30
taxes on long term capital gains = $3,315.30 x 10% = $331.53
To calculate Mason and Kirsty's after tax average annual return (interest rate) we can use the excel spreadsheet =RATE function, where:
- PV = -2174.70
- FV = 5490 - 331.53 = 5158.47
- Pmt = 38.88
- Nper = 7
=RATE (nper, pmt, pv, [fv])
=RATE (7,38.88,-2174.70,5158.47) = 14.41%
Answer:
The basic difference between both are explained below.
Explanation:
Explicit collusion is where firms meet and agree to charge the same price, and an example of implicit collusion is price leadership. Unlike explicit collusion, implicit collusion unlike explicit collusion, implicit collusion is where firms signal to each other without actually meeting and agreeing to charge the same price.
Unlike explicit collusion, wherever the occurrence of an accommodation that would lend ammunition for an antitrust court case might be unscrewed, implied collusion is challenging to document as well as to verify. Implicit collusion frequently seems to be nothing more than all firms individually responding to shifting market circumstances.
Google maybe I don't know if that's a soccial media
