Answer:
This is an example for the regulation of the government having a negative impact on trade.
The celling policy if people trade below that value is uneffective and useless but, if the agent of the market trade above the celling in some transactiosn (this book may be a best.seller or a book which is hard to find in the given moment) the regulation prohibits and no trade is done. No trade implies neither consumper or producer surplus. While the government state the celling acts in well-being and good for the consumer in this case it is proved wrongly. The consumer would pay between 59 and 64 having a surplus and the produced above 59 will also enjoy a surplus from trade.
Explanation:
Answer:
i think po is operating-term loans
Answer:
450 shares
$25
Explanation:
a 3 for 1 stock split is when 1 unit of shares is increased by 3
150 shares becomes (150 x 3) = 450
price becomes = $75/3 = $25
stock splits have no economic effect on the company and total shareholders wealth does not change
price / earnings does not change and market equity does not change
Answer:
Explanation:
a)
It is known that,
P(Sat) = 0.35
P(Sun) = 0.30
P(no rain on Sat) = 1 - 0.35
P(no rain on Sun) = 1 - 0.30
So P(rains on the weekend) = 1 - P(no rain on Sat) P(no rain on Sun) =
= 1 - (1-0.35)(1-0.30) = 0.545
b)
P(Sat Sun) = P(rains on Sat) P(rains on Sun) + P(rains on Sat) P(no rains on Sun) = 0.35*0.30 + 0.35*(1-0.30) = 0.35
