Answer:
I could not find online the text to which you are referring, but I can get an idea of what it refers to.
If we talk about love, and even more about a marriage that takes place for love, we are talking about something we do of our own free will, without seeking anything in return. It is a union that two people make with the confidence that it will last forever because they love each other, and their only interest is that promise of union that exists between one and the other.
On the other hand, an arranged marriage is usually carried out to obtain something in return and is devoid of love.
There are many religions that parents arrange marriages for their children without giving them a choice. There are other cases where maybe two people decide to get married to get some benefit, even if they are not in love.
Basically, those are the biggest differences between the two concepts.
B seems most correct. Have a good day/night!
Answer:
personification
Explanation:
shadows of the ship rock in the crest.
Repetition crest has been repeated
Answer:
D) The counter-argument believes the ERA will force women to be more like men
and thus void current individual gender privileges.
Explanation: Reading through it, the argument against ERA is that is would mean the end separate sex rights, with examples of how if it went into effect, the all male military draft will be deemed unconstitutional, and woman would have to be drafted too. Another example that was given was that protective laws like alimony and sexual assault would be gotten rid of. Another example that she gave was that the tendency of a divorced woman to keep child custody would be gone as well. Also, it was a career woman named Phyllis Schlafly, who even though had a law degree, still gave off the argument on how ERA would be horrible and undesirable. She also glorified the traditional woman role in America, and enjoying 'heckling' feminists.
(Hope this helps)