Answer:
Complex villages were at risk for diseases.
Complex villages had artisans with special skills.
Complex villages stored food in buildings.
Explanation:
The complex villages were well connected and functioned as towns (though smaller), so being linked with the surrounding area and beyond led to risks of diseases.
The complex villages had permanent buildings, so this statement is not correct.
Complex villages had people specialized in certain fields, thus they had artisans with special skills.
Complex villages worked in a hierarchical manner, so this statement is not correct.
Having a relatively large population in small area meant that larger amounts of food are needed, which is why the food was stored in buildings in the complex villages.
It was the (4) Mongols who used the stirrup, skilled horsemanship, and siege warfare techniques to conquer much of Asia and part of Europe in the 12th and 13th <span>centuries</span>
Everyone has the different idea from one and other, and it is good to have different opinion about the things.
<h3>Why are the reason of
clashes between the two people?</h3>
The reason of the clashes between the two people are the different set of minds, which people have. We all have different ideology and thinking in every situation and that is okay to have the different, there is not one right or wrong.
Thus, Everyone has the different idea from one and other,
For more details about clashes between the two people, click here:
brainly.com/question/2837579
#SPJ1
Answer:
D) the sixteenth amendment allowed congress to break up monopolies
Explanation:
The Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States (Amendment XVI) allows the United States Congress to tax an income tax without apportioning it among the states according to their population or based on the results of a census. This amendment excluded Income Tax from the constitutional requirements of direct taxes, after taxes on income, dividends and interest were qualified as direct taxes by the Supreme Court ruling in the Pollock case against Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. (1895). It was ratified in February 1913.
