Graph C is the correct option.
If you drew a straight line (mostly) connecting the points, it would be linear. A relationship is linear if one variable, in this case, x, increases by approximately the same rate as the other variables, in this case y.
If you drew lines connecting points on the other graphs, they wouldn’t resemble a straight line, therefore, they aren’t linear.
Your volume would be 27 inches cubed.
This is because Volume = length x width x height. If you multiply 3 x 3 x 3 you get 27. This resulting in your answer being 27.
When they leave home, odometer reads 12,544.....when they arrive in Winterton, the odometer reads 12,671.....this means they have already driven (12,671 - 12,544) = 127 miles.....and now they have 48 more miles to go......so the trip to Sandy Shores from Summerville is (127 + 48) = 175 miles
Answer:
For the reasons mentioned in the explanation section, it is indeed a weak generalization:
Step-by-step explanation:
- No, there is not enough data provided on certain subjects' age, socioeconomic status, etc. that may have influenced the investing decision.
- No, the survey isn't random, the study is irregular because each has a fair probability of expressing their true beliefs, here in this query it's written they've been told individuals are given actual medication, which may have contributed to the Hawthorne studies giving incorrect outcomes.
- No, the amount isn't sufficient mostly on the premise of 28 subject areas with be provided oxytocin, and therefore only one test being performed should we not be able to determine the results to implement for certain persons including billions of populace, it would be a hurried generalization.
Answer:
9 D and 10 B
Step-by-step explanation:
The conditional is what is next to IF and the hypothesis is what you expect in this case you expect it to be a whole number and a integer
