Answer:
1.It does not always promote fairness.
2. It does not require a majority vote of the population.
3. It creates a result that may not be the will of the people.
4. It creates a system where margins do not matter.
5. May encourage voters to stay home.
6. The electoral college is a complicated system.
Explanation:
I don't know if these are right or not but I hoped this helped!
Answer:
No, I don’t think the Brown court would have said that people could be separated by race on a train. Brown fought against segregation in schools because it was unconstitutional and violated the 14th Amendment. I can’t see why they would agree with segregation in other institutions.
The Plessy case, which occurred quite a bit earlier than the Brown case, ruled that segregation was okay as long as it was “separate but equal.” If it was Plessy v. Brown, Brown could have made the argument that “If it has to be separate, it’s not truly equal.” There’s no reason to divide the people unless there’s unfair treatment involved.
Answer:
The Metric Act of 1866, enacted on 28 July 1866 , legally recognized the metric system of measurement in the US. It's sometimes referred to as the Kasson Act, after Congressman John A. Kasson of Iowa, who chaired the House Committee on Coinage, Weights, and Measures.
Explanation:
The people didn't listen. God finally judged his people and it powerfully presents Jeremiahs message so later generations might the same sins.
