1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
liq [111]
4 years ago
5

Which of the following statements about electromagnetic and mechanical wa

Social Studies
1 answer:
densk [106]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Statement that is true about electromagnetic and mechanical waves is:

Option B: Mechanical waves must travel through a medium, but electromagnetic waves do not require a medium to travel.

Explanation:

'Electromagnetic' waves do not need any medium to travel whereas 'mechanical waves' need a medium or matter for transmission. Electromagnetic waves are produced by the 'vibrations' of the charged particles. They can even travel in vacuum.  

On the contrary, mechanical waves are caused by the 'wave amplitude'. Mechanical wave can travel in solid, liquid and gas and are considered to be periodic disturbance.

Thus, Option B is the most statement apt explaining the difference between electromagnetic and mechanical waves.

You might be interested in
In three to five sentences, describe the role of women in movements to improve social and economic conditions, and explain the s
-Dominant- [34]

Solution Here

The feminist movement has effected change in Western society, including women's suffrage; greater access to education; more equitable pay with men; the right to initiate divorce proceedings; the right of women to make individual decisions regarding pregnancy (including access to contraceptives and abortion); and the right to own property. Harvard Psychology Professor Steven Pinker argues that feminism has reduced domestic violence against men as their likelihood of being killed by a female intimate partner has decreased six-fold. However, fourth-wave feminism has coincided with significant increases in male violence and femicides against women, a lot of it regarded as a backlash.

academicgurusintl at g-mail dot com

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the constitution grant congress the power to create "inferior courts���? the builders of the constitution ensured the ex
Neko [114]
Congress and the Judiciary Act of 1789<span>

When the First Congress turned to the organization of the judicial branch, much of the debate centered on whether to establish lower federal courts or to rely on existing state courts to exercise federal jurisdiction. Advocates of a strong central government thought a national system of federal courts was an essential requirement for energetic government. Other members of Congress, recalling the colonial experience under British rule, thought that justice was best served by courts tied to local communities. Those who were suspicious of the concentration of national power wanted to grant state courts authority to hear all cases involving federal law or to limit local federal courts to admiralty and maritime law. The judiciary act approved in September 1789 established a federal court system with broad jurisdiction, but the act reserved a significant role for state courts and guaranteed that the diversity of legal traditions throughout the country would be recognized in the local federal courts.

The Judiciary Act of 1789 established three types of federal courts. The Supreme Court, with a chief justice and five associate justices, would meet twice a year in the nation’s capital and hear appeals from lower federal courts and from the state supreme courts. The Supreme Court would also exercise the limited original jurisdiction defined by the Constitution. In each state and in Kentucky and Maine (then parts of other states), a district court with a single judge would have exclusive jurisdiction to hear cases involving admiralty and maritime law and conduct trials of minor federal crimes. The district courts shared with the state courts jurisdiction over small suits brought by the United States.

The most important federal cases would be initiated in the third type of court, called circuit courts, which would convene in the same judicial districts in which the district courts met. The circuit courts had no judges of their own, but were served by two Supreme Court justices and the local district judge. (Congress soon revised the law to require only one justice on each circuit court.) Congress grouped the judicial districts into regional circuits for the purpose of assigning justices to serve on the circuit courts within that region. The circuit courts would hear some appeals from the district courts, but they were primarily trial courts. The circuit courts had exclusive jurisdiction over serious federal crimes and shared with the state courts jurisdiction over suits involving disputes above a certain monetary value, suits involving the U.S. government, and suits between citizens of different states.

Congress protected distinctive state legal traditions by drawing the judicial districts to coincide with state boundaries and by providing for the use of the respective state’s rules for most district and circuit court proceedings and for the selection of federal juries. Perhaps most important for protection of regional legal cultures, the assignment of “circuit riding” duties for Supreme Court justices ensured that the judges on the nation’s highest court would learn about local legal procedures and would interact with citizens at the point where cases entered the federal judicial system. The Judiciary Act also promoted a local orientation of the lower courts by requiring district judges to live in the district where they served. In response to widespread concerns that defendants in federal trials would be forced to appear in distant courts, the Judiciary Act required civil trials to be held in the district in which a defendant was served with a writ and trials involving the death penalty to be held in the county where the crime occurred.

I hope all this helps I am taking judicial law in school .
</span>
4 0
3 years ago
It is important to "vet" or check the references of your chosen translator prior to engaging an international client. Group of a
Leokris [45]
This is right because the kids will need all the help that they can get
7 0
3 years ago
ANSWER PLEASE
denis23 [38]

Answer:

The Civil War was a war between states. It lasted four years (1861-1865). The Civil War was fought in Southern Pennsylvania, but most of it took place in Virginia and Tennessee. Of course the Civil War wasn't easy. Soldiers had to deal with bad weather, hunger, and let's not forget to mention that a lot of them died in this war. One of the main reasons the Civil War happened was the issue with slavery. The Southern states wanted to get rid of any laws that would ruin the South being able to keep slaves and take them where ever they wanted. South wanted to take slavery over to the Western territories, but North wanted to stay free of slaves and continue on with white labor. So when Abraham Lincoln was elected without not one single vote from the Southern electoral vote, this made them feel left out of the political system, which turned into the Civil War. Though many people lost their lives, the United States ended up beating the Confederate States. Which led to the freedom of millions of enslaved Americans. During the Civil War women had a huge role on and off the battlefield. Women helped the soldiers, they provided medical care and some women even were brave enough to work as spies, and even bigger surprise some women were even soldiers helping fight in the Civil War. The Civil War was a BIG thing to happen in today's history, knowing that so many people put their lives on the line to make sure that all people were free and treated the same. It makes you wonder, what if these brave men AND women never stepped up and decided it was time for a change? What would life be like today?

Explanation:

OMG Writing this was actually kinda fun, I am glad I could help!

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How had World War One been good for the economy
Natalka [10]

Answer:IT has been good for the economy since the fact that a new treaty was signed and many new ideas where brought up in WW1. Things that where brought up in WW1 was things like the idea to have free trade.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST TO THE MOST FAST AND BEST ANSWER! HURRY PLEASE!
    9·2 answers
  • All of the following are positive effects of interest groups EXCEPT: A. hyperpluralism B. bringing awareness to issues of public
    15·2 answers
  • Annie and Bart are coworkers. In fact, they share a cubicle wall. Recently, they were involved in a fender-bender in the company
    8·2 answers
  • 3.
    7·2 answers
  • Use your knowledge about fallacies of relevance to determine which, if any, of the following statements are true. Check all that
    8·1 answer
  • What was one effect of mass production
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following is not an impact left by Medgar Evers?
    6·2 answers
  • President Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation after
    15·1 answer
  • Which planets were formed by collisions of asteroid sized debris
    15·1 answer
  • Barbara is driving home from school when she passes a speed limit sign. She checks her speedometer and notices that she is drivi
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!