Fatimah's self-esteem levels would be much higher than Grayson's based on the ideas of Carl Rogers.
Carl Rogers was a humanistic psychologist who's beliefs and studies centered around humans' need for <em>empathy, acceptance, and genuineness.</em> If Grayson's parents only loved her when she met their expectations, then her own self worth would be based solely on how she meets those expectations. Her environment did not support those three needs, meaning her self esteem levels would not be as high as Fatimah's. Unlike Fatimah, whose parents supported her human needs of empathy, acceptance, and genuineness, Grayson's parents did not support those needs. This would lead to Grayson's self esteem being much lower than Fatimah's.
The "Me" Decade I believe is the correct answer! Hope this helped!
Answer:
The answer is extinction.
Explanation:
In classical conditioning, extinction refers to the eventual cessation of a response to a stimulus. In other words, a subject stops reacting to a conditioned stimulus. In operant conditioning, exctinction may occur because the reinforcement is no longer present. For example, a child might stop cleaning his room if his mom stops rewarding or recognising him.
In getting the job done or doing your task as an employee, it is advisable to focus your time in working the tasks that has been given to you or to get the job done. It is only professional to not deal with person's feelings during at time of work because it is an ethical way to do because your job is to work and not to meddle with other people's feeling. It is only applicable to worry about them if you aren't working and if you're on a break.
The Stamp act was <span>an act
of the British Parliament in 1756 that exacted revenue from the American
colonies by imposing a stamp duty on newspapers and legal and
commercial documents. Colonial opposition led to the act's repeal in
1766 and helped encourage the revolutionary movement against the British
Crown.
Info of the stamp act from Yahoo answers.
Townshed Act </span>
The Townshend Acts were a series of acts passed – beginning in 1767 – by the Parliament of Great Britain relating to the British colonies in North America. The acts are named after Charles Townshend, the Chancellor of the Exchequer,
who proposed the program. Historians vary slightly in which acts they
include under the heading "Townshend Acts", but five acts are often
mentioned: the Revenue Act of 1767, the Indemnity Act (1767), the Commissioners of Customs Act (1767), the Ed Court Act (1768), and the New York Restraining Act (1767).[1]
The purpose of the Townshend Acts was to raise revenue in the colonies
to pay the salaries of governors and judges so that they would remain
loyal to Great Britain, to create a more effective means of enforcing
compliance with trade regulations, to punish the province of New York for failing to comply with the 1765 Quartering Act, and to establish the precedent that the British Parliament had the right to tax the colonies.[2] The Townshend Acts (1767) were met with resistance in the colonies, prompting the occupation of Boston by British troops in 1768, which eventually resulted in the Boston Massacre of 1770.
As a result of widespread protest in the American colonies, Parliament began to partially repeal the Townshend duties.[3] Most of the new taxes were repealed, but the tax on tea was retained. The British government continued in its attempt to tax the colonists without their consent and the American Revolution followed.
Info from Wikepedia.com
<span />
