Looking at maps and the shapes of the lakes, I’d say it’s C, Lake Victoria, that 4 is pointing to
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
With the historical thinking skills such as Crafting historical arguments from historical evidence, one will be able to formulate questions clearly and support it with historical evidence. Then using Chronological reasoning, one will be able to identify and analyze historical causes, evidence, and time to build an argument.
Also, using Comparison and contextualization, one will be able to compare historical evidence and connects it to other related issues. Then finally, with Historical interpretation and synthesis, one will be able to interpret this historical evidence from various sources it was derived.
When you set aside money for your child's education, even before they are born, it is called Long-term goal.
Long-term goals refer to goals that you wan tot achieve in future, meaning that the culmination or achievement of them is not an immediate requirement. These goals are usually set keeping in mind a stability and security for the future.
The minimum requirement for a long-term goal should be more than one year, the upper limit can be set by the consumer. Although, one invests in them for security, yet there is more uncertainty to these goals because of the varying market trends.
To learn more about long-term goals, click
brainly.com/question/11473389
#SPJ4
Answer:
Less-lethal weapons.
Explanation:
Less-Lethal weapons are those weapons that are less likely to kill any living being. They are less harmful than the conventional weapons. Less-lethal weapons are also known as non-lethal weapons, less-than lethal weapons, non-deadly weapons or pain-inducing weapons.
These weapons are used in the cases where using of lethal weapons is not permitted and to make the situation less chaotic.
Taser, as described above, is a weapon that is used to deliver electric shocks and thus do not possess the ability to kill a living being. So, it is a less-lethal weapon.
Thus, the correct answer is less-lethal weapon.
I believe the answer is: He believed he was God’s representative and should not be challenged.
James I believed that kings are appointed by the God himself and destined as a ruler for mankind. Because of this, he see King's power should be absolute and cannot be limited by restrictions made by the parliaments, which make him resist the development of power within the parliament.
