I believe the answer is: False
Mandatory language is actually advisable to be used in this situation.
Using mandatory language would set a clear limitation that make the consumers understand the magnitude of the danger. This would make them much more likely to follow the written warning.
People who speak using a combination of "powerful" and "powerless" language are typically more<u> "effective" </u>communicators.
Effective communication abilities are essential to accomplishment in numerous parts of life. Numerous occupations require solid relational abilities and individuals with great relational abilities more often than not appreciate better relational associations with loved ones.
Effective communication is a key relational aptitude and figuring out how we can enhance our correspondence has numerous advantages.
Effective communicators know how to set up a message with a solitary and perfectly clear concentration and they additionally know how to peruse a crowd of people and can redo their introduction to make that group of onlookers need to tune in.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
There is a writing agreement that states what rich has obliged to do for mark ,which is to sell mark a strip of land. Since he has put to writing the details of the agreement, he must fulfill every clause of the writing. Since 6 month has elapsed and rich has not respected the writing, mark has every right to recourse.
The crook represented kingship (in that it compared the people of Egypt to a flock and their leader a shepherd) and the flail represented the land's fertility, as it is a farming tool.
