Based on the given statement above, I can say that the type of comparison that is being shown is a SIMILE. A simile is a literary technique that compares two unlike objects with the use of the words "like" or "as...as". Apparently, this uses "as...as" in comparing "they" and "bark of a tree". Hope this helps.
Answer:
1 .She said that she lived in New York
2.She told me that he worked in a bank
3.She said that Julie didn't like going out much
4.She said that she does not have a computer
5.She said that they never arrive on time
6.He told me that they often met friends in London over the weekend
7.She said that David does not have any children
8.She said that she does not go to the gym very often
9.She said that Lucy owned three flats in the city
10.She said that she never got up early on Sundays
Explanation:
When writing in reported speech you should change the tense from past to present,remove the inverted commas and place 'that' after said and commence with your past sense sentence
This suggests that the writer belivies, or want to believe, that dragons could be real or were real.
The belief that leads to this policy is an example of b. both prejudice and discrimination.
<h3 /><h3>Meaning of Prejudice and Discrimination</h3>
Prejudice refers to a judgment that was made before without considering the facts. Discrimination is the act of treating a distinct group differently from the rest.
Both of these factors played out in the decision of the restaurant's owner. He displayed prejudice when he made a decision based on what he believed will be the case.
Discrimination is also seen in the tendencies of the whites to not tip well because of the presence of the blacks. So, option B is right.
Learn more about prejudice here:
brainly.com/question/25189630
Answer:
Explanation:
The musical or the book?
I don't see much of him no matter what basis you use -- book or musical. Do you?
He flourished in a time when knights were bound by a code of honor and the results were not good if you broke that code of honor. He had no intention of doing anything that was wrong. He was so high minded that Sancho Panza had to keep on reminding himself that the Don was either a great saint or an unholy fool and throughout the entire production of both he never really made up his mind. Don Quixote was far too remote, far too idealistic, far too much of a man seeking the world not as it was, but as he wanted it to be. Sancho could never bring himself to see the world that way. And yet, he stuck with him. If his understanding did not increase, his wonder did. The more he saw, the less he really knew, but that was only part of it. Every person must make up their own mind about Sancho. I've spent so much time on him because he is more like modern man. The difference is that he hung around to see if he could come to some understanding of the Don.
Dulcinia is a different person that both of them, but she sees more clearly who Don Quixote is and she tries to push him away but she's not fully successful. I'm a guy and in general, I like that kind of woman. She tried to see him through a different set of lenses. His code prevented him from doing anything about it. We modern people would show no such hesitancy. Dulcinia may give us what we want but she respects the Don. She will never forget him whereas in a year's time, she could not remember anything about the rest of us.
