Answer:
thank you for the points...
Explanation:
... *pause* im not doin' it
*elizabethlilly.c has left*
Answer:
I had written to her already
Answer:
I wouldn't leave because I was born in the United States and I did not want to leave it because it is the awesome place would like if the United States was like on fire something then yeah I would go to like Hawaii or something but I would not leave
The cartoon satirizes how humans tend to criticize others' problems more than their own. This is done through the device of humor known as irony.
<h3>How can we come to this conclusion?</h3>
- The artist shows a bird that was annoyed by the creaking of a door.
- The artist shows that the bird has chicks that make more noise than the creaking door, but he ignores it.
- The bird does not control the chicks but wants the owner of the fence to control the noise it makes
The artist uses irony to show a different conclusion from what the audience is expecting. This is because, on the one hand, the public expects the bird to control its extremely noisy chicks. However, the bird leaves its chicks making noise and starts complaining about the noise of the neighbor's fence door.
It is important to emphasize that irony is the device that promotes unpredictability, showing elements different from what would be obvious.
Learn more about irony:
brainly.com/question/2893936
#SPJ1
Answer:
Connell tells his story in an understated fashion, most often allowing the events to speak for themselves. He does, however, at times interject his own opinions, and he makes it clear that his is a modernist perspective: The battle is finally more absurd than heroic, more pitiful than romantic.
Explanation: oof- someone said this already
