Answer:
Radar's additional income for accepting the order is calculated as follows:
Sales - 320 x $460 = $147,200
less Cost of Sales = 320 x $180 + $48,000 = $105,600
Additional Income = $41,600
Explanation:
The additional income of $41,600 is $147,200 - $105,600, which is the result of deducting cost of sales from Sales.
The cost of sales includes the variable cost per bike, including the incremental fixed costs ($48,000) to make this order.
To make a decision whether to accept an order or not, the company needs to consider all variable costs, including the incremental fixed costs. The resulting additional income is what is available to offset the fixed costs.
Answer:
C) violated the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial.
Explanation:
Federal Sentencing Guidelines should be guided by the following principles:
- The court should order the organization to remedy any harm caused.
- If the primary purpose of the organization was to commit crimes, then the court should set a fine that strips away all the assets from the organization.
- The court should set fines based on how serious the offenses were and the degree of culpability of the organization.
-
The court can impose a probation sentence if it believes that the organization will take steps to reduce the likelihood of future criminal conduct.
The sentencing guidelines should offer incentives for organizations to eliminate criminal conduct.
Answer:
"$2,500" is the appropriate answer.
Explanation:
The question given seems to be incomplete. Below there is a attachment of full question is provided.
The given values are:
Plywood's price,
= $6 per sheet
Price falls,
= $4
Now,
At price $6, the consumer surplus will be:
= 
= 
= 
($)
When price falls, the consumer surplus will be:
= 
= 
= 
($)
Hence,
The increase in consumer surplus will be:
= 
= 
($)
Answer:
The answer is a. $2,967.92
Explanation:
Calculation of prent value
Present value = p* (1+i)^-10
Present value = $4,500 * (1+0.0425)^-10= <u>$2,967.92</u>
Answer: $54,000 per production run
Explanation:
As we are dealing with the decision of whether or not to process the good further, the irrelevant cost would be the cost of producing product B from input R.
This is because this cost has already been incurred to produce product B and so is a sunk cost. Sunk costs are irrelevant to the decision to process further.
30,000 units of B were made from 90,000 units R so the cost of B is:
= 30,000 / 50,000 * 90,000
= $54,000
<em />
<em>The options here are probably for a variant of this question.</em>
