1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mixas84 [53]
3 years ago
12

Which type of reasoning is usually based on laws, rules, principles, generalizations, or definitions?

English
2 answers:
adelina 88 [10]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd

Explanation:

Volgvan3 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is D. Deductive

Explanation:

The word "reasoning" refers to the process in which facts are established and prove based on logic; additionally, in this process, there are different types of reasoning. In the case of the deductive reasoning, this occurs as general laws, events, rules, principles or any others that are general are applied to particular cases or events. For example, if we know penguins cannot fly we can conclude the penguins we see in a zoo cannot fly either. This differs from inductive reasoning because inductive reasoning goes is based on particular or specific events. Thus, it is the deductive reasoning the one that is based on laws, rules, principles, etc.

You might be interested in
How have Black Hawk’s cultural experiences shaped his view about the nature of the danger Native Americans face in their conflic
navik [9.2K]
Black Hawk is talking of his experience of being beaten by warfare of the white man against his people and him being imprisoned. He suggests that is the only way to try to right the wrongs the white man has visited against him ie by resisting the white man's expansion into his territories. He considers the white man to be deceitful and only friendly in order to find a way to dupe the Indian. In fact Black Hawk would probably be very happy to see how the First Nations peoples have multiplied in recent years and obtained higher education and learned how to battle the white society in the courts and with road blocks and demonstrations etc and obtain some important land claims like the Tsilqhotin one in British Columbia, Canada.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Match the following!<br>drag and drop <br>this is from usa test prep......
Degger [83]
Literal meaning: you look like my aunt linda, close that door, math is my worst subject.
figurative meaning: shut your trap, the sun smiled down on us throughout the picnic, he has perfect vision but he’s blind all the same.
8 0
3 years ago
What the boys think they see<br>on the merintain (describe :​
BabaBlast [244]

Answer:

Samneric believe they've seen the beast.... that they've seen it claws, teeth and all..... and that it followed them as they ran away.

Explanation:

They see a fallen parachuter but they let their imaginations get the better of them. They think it is a beast becasue they can see the flapping of the parachute in the wind.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is positive economics?​
lapo4ka [179]

Answer:

Positive economics is an objective stream of economics that relies on facts or what is happening.

Explanation:

4 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
What conclusion can readers draw about Charlie based on his description of taking the Rorschach test?
tatyana61 [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

On March 4th, when Charlie took the Rorschach Test, he was supposed to view the images of the inkblots and freely imagine what he saw in them. But Charlie only saw the inkblots for what they were: blobs of ink. Even when Burt tells him to imagine, to pretend, to look for something there in the card, Charlie can't. He struggles to give a true description of the cards, pointing out how one was "a very nice pictur of ink with pritty points all around the eges," but again, this isn't the response that the psychologist is looking for.

Like ambiguously shaped clouds in which people "see" images of people and animals, the inkblots have enough random, busy shapes on them for people to interpret them as many different things--people, animals, scenes, conflicts, and so on. The idea is that the psychologist will pay attention to what a person thinks he or she sees in the inkblots, which is supposed to provide insight on what that person thinks and feels overall.

As a result of Charlie's inability to properly take this test, he worries that he's failed and that he won't be a candidate for the treatment to increase his intelligence. And while he gets frustrated with himself during the test, and while Burt seems to get almost angry--as evinced when his pencil point breaks--I wouldn't say that Charlie is angry in this situation.

But what this scene does reveal about his character is that perhaps he's already smarter than we expect. By insisting on seeing the inkblots for what they really are, and by failing to imagine scenes and images that are false or skewed, Charlie shows that he's not just honest but scrupulous. This early evidence of his good character foreshadows the upcoming conflicts he has with the men at the bakery as well as the researchers themselves, who are less scrupulous.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If you happen to find a treasure in a cave what you do it and why
    10·2 answers
  • Who is the narrator of Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea?
    15·1 answer
  • Mario is researching a paper on William Shakespeare’s use of supernatural elements in Macbeth. Which sources can Mario use to fi
    5·2 answers
  • three ways in which people's beliefs and word views have influenced woman's participation in football
    6·1 answer
  • In the book Anne of Green Gables what does Matthew say about Mrs. Blewett?
    10·2 answers
  • What's a denotative meaning
    10·2 answers
  • Which part of speech is the underlined word?
    10·1 answer
  • Read this information about the work environments of various careers.
    5·2 answers
  • How do we keep ourselves connected to others through tradition? OR How does tradition keep us separate from others?
    14·1 answer
  • Montresor is telling this story 50 years after the events took place. Do you think that this narrative is a confession? Consider
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!