Answer:
O The first paragraph discusses the idea that Americans are united as one despite their differences. The second paragraph discusses the idea that acts of intolerance make it difficult to believe that Americans are united as one.
Explanation:
Anna Quindlen's "A Quilt of a Country" is a commentary on the spirit of the American nation as a whole in dealing with enemies and uniting against a common enemy. The focus of this literary work is to emphasize how Americans unify against a foreign enemy while at times being discriminatory against an immigrant within themselves.
In the first paragraph, Quindlen presents a united American against a common enemy, fighting for a common aim despite their differences. But the second paragraph presents an idea of acts of intolerance that makes it hard to accept and understand how they can be united as one.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
Answer:
I'd feel selfconscious
Explanation:
idk if you mean sitting at the front or academically but yeah I would be very aware of myself and my actions
Answer:
The answer would be A) I
Explanation:
An elliptical clause is a clause in which some words have been left out. Because of the pattern or logic of the entire sentence, it is clear what the missing words are. An elliptical clause may be either independent or subordinate. Example: Jessica had five dollars; Monica, three.
I've seen many people get bullied about there cultural trait. In schools usually the person that dosent have the same colors you and your friends usually get bullied. There has been a couple of times where i bullied people because of there cultural trait. It seems fun at first but inside your hurting. People need to stop bulling because its not right and its causing deaths.
<em><u>This is for question purposes only its not real </u></em>
Answer: quoting.
The best method for incorporating evidence in this case would be quoting. This is because the original text is easily accessible, and because, if the reader were to question your argument, he would be able to easily compare your analysis with the text. Moreover, your claim refers to the use of language in the book, which does not require secondary sources in order to be interpreted.
