1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
EleoNora [17]
3 years ago
13

What impact did the Dred Scott decision have on the slavery issue

History
1 answer:
mariarad [96]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

he was against it because he did not like the idea of having people enslaved to do others work with no freedom or pay

Explanation:

hope this helps

You might be interested in
Why did the U.s help the french in their fight against HoChiMinh?
Studentka2010 [4]

The US was certainly anticommunist and certainly a French ally but it is described in Bernard Fall's "Hell in a Very Small Place" as a gradual process.

8 0
3 years ago
What is the name of the German who printed the first bible in the 1450s.
Lerok [7]
Johannes Gutenburg is the person you are looking for.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Should the united states have annexed the philippines?
beks73 [17]
Yes they should i did this before

3 0
3 years ago
What belief of the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) was expressed in the 1962 Port Huron Statement?
UNO [17]

Answer: Americans were controlled through consumerism

Explanation:

I just did it and got it right on apex

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are some potential benefits and potential costs of total war, and do the potential benefits ever outweigh the costs ?
dimaraw [331]

The concept of "total war" refers to a type of armed conflict that is bound by no rules or limitations in terms of who is being attacked, the weapons that are used or the elements of society that will be sacrificed to win it.

Engaging in this type of war can have some benefits, such as:

  • There is no need for the government to define its objectives clearly.
  • Because of it, there is no accountability between the government and its citizens, which gives them free reign of action.
  • Countries with a strong military can use their full power.

However, the costs far outweigh the benefits:

  • Increased cost of human lives, from all parties involved.
  • The destruction of all civil society.
  • Because civil society is so disrupted, government institutions are likely to collapse as well.
  • Extremely difficult recovery process, both politically as economically.
  • Complete depletion of the country's resources.
  • Violation of human rights and the laws of just war.
  • Closes the door to any peaceful solution.

There is rarely, if ever, a situation in which a total war provides benefits that would outweigh the costs of it, or that would not be achieved through some other means.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How much material did it take to build the great pyramid?
    10·1 answer
  • How were immigrants treated when they first arrived in the United States in the 1800s and
    12·1 answer
  • True or false? State governments have many things in common with<br> the federal government.
    11·1 answer
  • What do tobacco, cotton, and rice have in common?
    11·1 answer
  • When did Ghana gets independence
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following describes muckrakers?
    8·1 answer
  • How did Ronald Reagan's belief in Peace Through Strength guide United States policies?
    10·1 answer
  • (blank) is Dante’s guide in the first two parts of The Divine Comedy
    12·1 answer
  • What events influenced the growth of environmental movement in the United States? Why did the environmental movement attract man
    10·1 answer
  • What is the presentation a lawyer makes before Supreme Court justices called?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!