Answer:
the meaning behind events and characters a ction
Example:
2896 Berry Drive, Hamilton Bay NJ, 89765
FedEx Corporations (Kyle Williams: Principal Manager)
December 26, 2021
Mrs. Anna Hodges
Johnson's Professional Stationary Services
5678 Wiley Street
Hamilton Bay NJ, 89765
Dear Mrs. Hodges,
I would like to re-inform you that your application for the box of card-stock will not be received on time, because of the upcoming holiday. Most of our workers are taking a vacation, and I am sorry to say that your boxes will not be arriving anytime soon.
We will oblige to giving you a discount, and a complementary FedEx key-chain. We also hope that you will use our service sometime soon.
Have a great Christmas, and congrats on getting your new home.
Sincerely,
FedEx Corporations (Kyle Williams: Principal Manager)
<u>Example Order</u>
<em>Sender's Contact Information (Some letters have the phone number and email.)</em>
<em>Date</em>
<em>Receiver's Contact Information</em>
<em>Greetings (It is very professional to greet the Receiver with formal greeting terms.)</em>
<em>Body (Some letters start with a subject, so that the Receiver can understand the what the letter is conveying.)</em>
<em>Closing</em>
<em>Signature (Most people prefer a handwritten signature for formal purposes. It makes the receiver feel like you spent time on the letter.)</em>
Answer:
The answer is A.
Explanation:
It is A. because in the first draft it does not have to look nice only in the final draft it does after editing, revising, and then publishing it.
Answer:
I do not see any excerpt, So sorry but i dont think anyone can help
Answer:
The correct answer is B.
Explanation:
The excerpt from Tinker v. Des Moines that shows how precedent helps support an argument is: "Other cases cited by the Court do not, as implied, follow the McReynolds reasonableness doctrine. West Virginia v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, clearly rejecting the 'reasonableness' test, held that the Fourteenth Amendment made the First applicable to the States". This excerpt shows how the Supreme Court uses decisions of other cases already resolved to support arguments within cases in decision at the moment .In the present case, the Court uses the precedent West Virginia v. Barnette, in which the doctrine of "reasonableness" of McReynolds is not admitted, to apply it to the case Tinker v. Des Moines.