<span>I this case, the loan is still valid and at that point Mike would be responsible for finding a way to pay the loan back as agreed upon in the contract. This is called co-signing, when two parties both sign for a loan together. Both parties are responsible for the loan and even though David cannot be found, the loan must still be paid and Mike would be held responsible for this.</span>
Answer:
C. strictly liable for Will's injuries
Explanation:
In law, Strict liability is a situation when defendant is required to be responsible to a certain situation, but can't be considered as guilty to any violation.
There are two points that need to be highlighted from the case above:
1. Astor Manufacturing process has fulfilled all of its safety regulation for storing the dangerous product.
2. The dangerous product owned by Astor Manufacturing caused William's injury.
The regulations for hazard management is created by the government, and the leak is not caused by their negligence. It's caused by unexpected natural disaster. This is why we can't say that Astor is guilty to any violation.
But still, the chemical that they created injured William. The court will most likely force Astor to be responsible for all the medical expenses incurred by william.
It will take 2 years because eaxh year you get 4% of the $2500 which means $100 a year
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": FICA.
Explanation:
The FICA (<em>Federal Insurance Contributions Act</em>) is a U.S. law that requires a paycheck deduction to be paid to <em>Social Security</em> and <em>Medicare</em>. Employers and employees share half the payment unless an individual is self-employed meaning the full amount must be covered by that person.
