All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following statements is CORRECT?

1 answer:

meriva3 years ago

3 0

Answer: E) If a firm's stock price is quite high relative to most stocks--say $500 per share--then it can declare a stock split of say 20-for-1 so as to bring the price down to something close to $25. Moreover, if the price is relatively low--say $2 per share--then it can declare a "reverse split" of say 1-for-10 so as to bring the price up to somewhere around $20 per share.

Explanation:

Stock Splits usually occur when a company believes that its stock price is relatively high compared to most other stocks.

If the stock is $500 per share, a stock split of 20-1 would divide the stock so that it comes to;

=500/20

= $25 per share.

If the company believes that prices are too low, they can do a reverse split or a stock merge to bring the price up by merging stocks together. If Stock is trading at $2 per share, a 1 - 10 would take it up to;

= 2 * 10

= $20 per share.

You might be interested in

What is the main reason the government creates regulations? to keep control over what is bought and sold in the us to make sure

zubka84 [21]

to make sure business is conducted safely and fairly

The government creates regulations in order to make sure business is conducted safely and fairly. Without regulation the market would have to auto regolate itself, which is a thing that it does, but the cost of this autoregulations are often too much. The government can help create basic directories to ensure that the trade is safe done.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Ingvar Kamprad’s influence over IKEA may have even been stronger than that of Sam Walton over Walmart because IKEA is a privatel

julia-pushkina [17]

Answer:

There are similarities in the way businesses are run, but the management and influencing capacity on both are completely different.

Though during the founding days both the organizations, IKEA and Walmart operated under direct influence of the founders.

Also, power and responsibility is more shared, though there would be some adaptation and conflict changes that is expected, but it is differently structured than Walmart and would not suffer much.

Explanation:

Solution:

Now,

There are similarities in the way businesses are run, but the management and influencing capacity on both are completely different.

Though during the founding days both the organizations, IKEA and Walmart operated under direct influence of the founders.

Where as Walmart still had a lot of key decisions directly made through the founders,

Key global expansion

Key local management

Everything was micro managed from the HQ through Sam.

But after the few years of success, the model of IKEA remained same but they went to several countries and became more regional.

Global decisions were made from The HQ under the direct supervision of Ingvar But all the key regional war was given to a CEO, who had all the decisions to make.

This way there was a lot of power sharing and responsibility distributed. In case of any problem, HQ has interruptions to make it correct.

This implies power and responsibility is more shared, though there would be some issues and adaptation changes that is expected, but it is differently structured than Walmart and would not suffer that much.

Therefore, No the effect would not be similar to that of Walmart leadership transition.

7 0

3 years ago

One possible reason as to why consumers respond to sales is that by displaying a "high" regular price and a "low" sale price, sa

Olenka [21]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Experiments regarding consumer behavior have shown that consumers usually expect a product to have a certain price that serves as a reference price that they use to determine if a retailer's price is high (more expensive than the reference price) or low (cheaper than the reference price).

It is normal (but unethical) that some retailers increase their prices a little before starting a sales campaign, since a higher reference price will make consumers believe that the offer is even better.

8 0

3 years ago

To prevent loss of work on the computer, it is essential to:

MA_775_DIABLO [31]

Answer: Its D. Save your document Frequently

Explanation: Hoped i helped!

4 0

3 years ago

On January 1, 2020, Blue Co. purchased 24,000 shares (a 10% interest) in Elton John Corp. for $1,300,000. At the time, the book

Len [333]

Answer:

$4,465,400

Explanation:

The investment in Elton in 2020 $1,300,000

share of 2020 net income(10%*$690,000) $69,000

ending balance of investment in 2020 $1,369,000

Share of net income 6/30/21 ($480,000*10%) $48,000

ending balance of investment 6/30/21 $1,417,000

Acquisition of investment 7/1/2021 $2,920,000

Total amount of investment $4,337,000

share of net income 12/31/2021($800,000*30%) $240,000

Dividends received(48,000+24,000)*$1.55 ($111,600)

balance of investment in Elton John Corp $4,465,400

In computing the above value,at each point in time the share of Blue Co from net income earned by Elton john corp is added while any dividends received in cash is deducted.

8 0

3 years ago