He Moved around and taught about the ideas about Greek culture.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The most valid counter-argument to the description of the Mongols by the Russian duke was that the Mongols were interested only in plunder and treasure but not in controlling the Russian territory.
As we know by reading this part of history, the Mongols were terrible warriors that showed no mercy. They were fierce fighters that indeed were interested in destroying and plunder. And more than conquering and establish a form of government to rule a territory, by the way, they attacked and proceeded, it seemed that they were more interested in becoming wealthy.
Answer:
Fact.
Explanation:
A proposition of fact is considered to be a statement in which the focus is primarily to make the audience (e.g arbitrator) believe in it as the truth of false.
In other words, a proposition of fact may deals basically on the existence or non existence, occurrence or non occurrence of something.
Hence, in this case, Since they were focusing on whether something did or did not happen, they were arguing a proposition of FACT.
So we could have freedom from the British
