<span>vigilante committees were basically formed to administer law and order where most considered it to be governmental structures inadequate. </span>
Answer:
I think certain themes apply to civilizations separated by thousands of miles and hundreds of years because humans tend to live similar issues and circumstances that made them make decisions conducive to solve problems, although many different ways of thinking oppose a single way to resolve things
The Swedish Empire (Swedish: stormaktstiden, "the era of great power") refers to the Kingdom of Sweden's territorial control of much of the Baltic region during the 17th and early 18th centuries, a time when Sweden was one of the great European powers.[1] The beginning of the Empire is usually taken as the reign of Gustavus Adolphus, who ascended the throne in 1611, and the end as the loss of territories in 1721 following the Great Northern War. In Swedish history, the period is referred to as stormaktstiden, literally meaning "the Great Power era".[1]
After the death of Gustavus Adolphus in 1632, the empire was, over lengthy periods, controlled by part of the high nobility, most prominently the Oxenstierna family, acting as tutors for minor regents. The interests of the high nobility contrasted with the uniformity policy (i.e., the upholding of the traditional equality in status of the Swedish estates favoured by the kings and peasantry). In territories acquired during the periods of de facto noble rule, serfdom was not abolished, and there was also a trend to set up respective estates in Sweden proper. The Great Reduction of 1680 put an end to these efforts of the nobility and required them to return estates once gained from the crown to the king. Serfdom, however, remained in force in the dominions acquired in the Holy Roman Empire and in Swedish Estonia, where a consequent application of the uniformity policy was hindered by the treaties by which they were gained.
After the victories in the Thirty Years' War, the climax of the great power era was reached during the Second Northern War, when their primary adversary Denmark was neutralized by the Treaty of Roskilde in 1658. However, in the further course of this war as well as in the subsequent Scanian War, Sweden was able to maintain her empire only with support of her closest ally, France.[2] Charles XI of Sweden consolidated the empire and ensured a period of peace, before Russia, Saxony and Denmark started a concerted attack on his successor, Charles XII. After initial Swedish victories, Charles secured the empire for some time in the Peace of Travendal (1700) and the Treaty of Altranstädt (1706), before the Battle of Poltava (1709) finally brought the great power era of Sweden to an end.
Answer:
Bill Clinton
Explanation:
I made this judgement based on their economic performance alone. None of them were particularly a stand out in terms of socio-cultural perspective.
Between the three of them Bill Clinton had significantly more economic accomplishments:
- He was the first president who achieve budget surplus in the last century. (With a $236 billion surplus in 2000). Reagan increased the national debt by $1.85 trillion and Bush increased the national debt by $ 6.1 trillion.
-Bill Clinton reached the lowest unemployment in history (4.0 percent in November 2000)
- USA also experienced its longest economic expansion in history, with around 115 months of continuous economic expansion with an average of 4% increase each.
I just answered another of these questions, and the answer is The Bill of Rights.
