1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Stels [109]
3 years ago
13

The 19th century doctrine of nullification (the opposite of the supremacy clause) support the belief that

History
2 answers:
kolezko [41]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

D - States have the right to decide whether or not federal laws will be followed within their borders.

Explanation:

The Doctrine of Nullification is a famous one in the United State of America. It basically anchors on the central idea that a state has the legal right under its jurisdiction to repudiate or accept any laws promulgated or enacted by the federal government on matters bordering on the state.

Among the options so enlisted, option D aptly captures this central theme.

Option A deviate from the central theme as the issue of Congress has nothing to do with the acceptance of the state or not. It is done at the central level. It is however the products of such Congress that can be contested and challenged at the state level.

Option B speaks on Commerce at both state and interstate level. This is true constitutionally. However, this is easily contested under the 19th doctrine of nullification at the state level.

Option C tows same thought process option A and B, as it clearly show a departure at the central theme the doctrine of nullification is built upon.

Doctrine of Nullification simply reserves the right to directly influence the administration of laws and governance at respective state levels. This is the underlying basis. Any actions thus enacted by the central government will be viewed from same prism.

inessss [21]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

states have the right to decide whether or not federal laws will be followed within their borders

Explanation:

The Constitution’s Supremacy Clause clearly stated that federal law is the ‘supreme Law of the Land. Despite the arguments against the theory of nullification, state governments have continued to uphold the theory of nullification, citing that they have the powers to declare certain federal governments’ laws to be null and void.

Certain crisis around nullification was seen in the history of the united states around 1832 between the federal government of the country and south Carolina because the state moved to declare null and void the federal Tariffs of 1828 and 1832 .

You might be interested in
According to the panama canal treaty signed by president carter, it says that
LuckyWell [14K]

Answer:

The treaty recognized Panama as the territorial sovereign in the Canal Zone but gave the United States the right to continue operating the canal until December 31, 1999.

Explanation:

On September 7, 1977, President Jimmy Carter and Panamanian leader Omar Torrijos signed the Panama Canal Treaty, which ceded U.S. control of the canal beginning in 2000 and guaranteed the neutrality of the waterway thereafter.

The treaties guaranteed that Panama would gain control of the Panama Canal after 1999, ending the control of the canal that the U.S. had exercised since 1903. The treaties are named after the two signatories, U.S. President Jimmy Carter and the Commander of Panama's National Guard, General Omar Torrijos.

8 0
3 years ago
What was the main interest of muckrakers
Nataly_w [17]
The term muckraker<span> was used in the </span>Progressive Era<span> to characterize reform-minded American journalists who attacked established institutions and leaders as corrupt. They typically had large audiences in some popular magazines. In the US, the modern term is </span>investigative journalism<span> — it has different and more pejorative connotations in British English 

</span><span>The muckrakers played a highly visible role during the Progressive Era period, 1890s–1920s</span>
8 0
3 years ago
How did the Peonage system affect Latin America?
Dvinal [7]
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "c. It furthered class divisions between wealthy Creoles and poverty stricken Mestizoes and Natives." The Peonage system affect Latin America is that it <span>furthered class divisions between wealthy Creoles and poverty stricken Mestizoes and Natives.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Today, your project will help you grasp the consequences and possible omissions within the Treaty of Versailles. You will prepar
Elina [12.6K]

Answer:

The theme chosen was "change in the main agreements built in the Versailles Treaty"

Explanation:

Gentlemen, when reading and analyzing the provisions established in the Treaty of Versailles, I felt the need to bring them together so that together we can discuss these provisions so that we can foresee possible harmful consequences for us and for all nations in the world.

Although Germany was one of the main culprits for the establishment of the war that caused us so much harm, I am afraid that the treaty established, will reinforce resentful feelings in the German population, regarding the difficulties that the treaty impose in the recovery of this region.

I fear that these feelings will trigger political and social movements that will stimulate a population revolt that results in yet another conflict to which we will be involved.

With that, I propose that some points of the Versailles Treaty be modified and that the punishments for Germany be milder in some ways. I do not ask for Germany to be pardoned, but for the treaty to propose punishments that allow the population to recover and have a dignified life, because despite the regrets, we are all human beings and in addition to paying for our mistakes, we must be able to maintain our  dignity.

5 0
3 years ago
Which was not a negative consequence of child labor
Naddika [18.5K]

Answer: B. They earned more money than their parents

Explanation:

Child Laborers in the United States was a very widespread practice in the 1800s and early 1900s. These children suffered all manner of abuse and were made to do work that even adults should not do sometimes.

As a result they missed out on school and worked in jobs so dangerous that they risked injury or even death. Some might have made more than their parents if their parents had no job but the money that these children made contributed to the welfare of their family so this was not a negative consequence of child labor.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Congress can override a president's veto by a __________ vote of both the house of representatives and the senate.
    13·1 answer
  • How do people travel in the Congo River Basin?
    12·2 answers
  • What did mary mcleod do to help fight discrimination and racism ​
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement describes why the US helped other countries resist Communism?
    14·2 answers
  • What is the name of the writing system of the ancient Egyptians?​
    15·1 answer
  • How does its geography benefit Egypt
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a tactic used by opponents of the Civil Rights Act of 1964? A. They proposed revisions to the law that
    9·1 answer
  • Some issues that Americans disputed in the 1800s are still controversial today. Which of the following continues to be an issue
    7·1 answer
  • Why were black legislators removed from the General Assembly? <br><br> plz help
    12·1 answer
  • What similarities do these two documents share?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!