Answer:
The correct answer is D. Judges in a common law system have the power to interpret the common law so that it applies to the unique circumstances of an individual case.
Explanation:
The common law system is based, above all, on the analysis of judicial sentences handed down by the same court or one of its higher courts (those to which decisions made by said court can be appealed) and on the interpretations that in these sentences are given from the laws. This is why the laws can be ambiguous in many respects, as the courts are expected to clarify them (or they have already done so on previous, but similar, laws).
On the other hand, there are judicial interpretations that create new legal figures, which in the beginning was the norm, but today is the exception. However, the nomenclature that recognizes as a statutory offense, for example, the offense created by law, is maintained. At present, it is much more common for laws to create completely new figures or to standardize and set the rules previously established by court sentences.
A very important detail is that, in subsequent cases, the sufficient reason of the sentences previously handed down obliges a court (and all courts below this) to fail to the same way or similarly. This is why the study of the system is based on the detailed analysis of the sentences from which the norm is induced, a study that ends in the elaboration of a "typical case", which is compared with the situation under study to see if it is similar or not. On many occasions, several sentences containing the same principle, viewed from different perspectives, are analyzed to finally extract the rule that will be applied to the case under study.
Under 21 can never sit at the "bar" itself
Presidential meetings usually are about classified information, which means that they can be top secret, secret and confidential. Usually, in these presidential meetings matters of national security and defense against terrorism are discussed and if information of these meetings is released to the public national security might be at risk.
Despite this, The Presidential Records Act - created in 1981 - determines the preservation of all presidential records. The Act determines that public access to Presidential records can begin five years after the end of the Administration.
1. There isnt enough man power
2. Not enough recorces
3. Didnt have technology unlike now
The answer is Glittering generalities
Glittering generalities are words that have different positive meaning for an individual but linked to a highly valued concept
it commonly used in politics and polotocal propaganda
