Answer:
-John B. Watson and B. F. Skinner.
Explanation:
John B. Watson: He is known for theorizing behaviorism and hence implementing it to the child development. According to him, an individual's (child) environment is responsible for shaping his or her behavior rather than the genetics and natural temperament.
B. F. Skinner: He believed the idea of behaviorism and has developed or introduced operant conditioning theory. According to him, an individual's behavior is determined by various consequences including punishments and reinforcements.
The correct answer for this question is Eighth Amendment. People who are against capital punishment argue that it violates the Eighth Amendment. Thank you for posting your question. I hope this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help.
The answer to this question is a conflict of interest. Code
of ethics is simply is a set of rules and regulations issued by an
organization, company, or business which is being followed by its members,
staff, and employees. In the code of ethics, it also states the company’s
mission and vision which the employees use as a guide to make the company run
smoothly and achieve its goal. Conflict of interest in a code of ethics means
that the person is being involved in a situation where his or her judgments are
being compromised. Conflict of interest
also involves when a person benefited on a situation that conflicts his role or
duty.
Answer:
Junto con el lenguaje, el parentesco es sin duda la principal institución humana, que constituye nuestra principal diferencia específica con las demás especies animales. Las otras también se comunican y se aparean, pero sólo los seres humanos decimos "no" (principal característica del lenguaje) y sólo nosotros, al emparejarnos (lo que implica decir no a las parejas prohibidas por el tabú del incesto), contraemos alianzas con otras familias, reforzando y ampliando nuestras redes de parentesco: es la regla de exogamia que fundamenta el orden social. Valga esta simplista generalización para introducir mi comentario a este gran libro que describe la transformación de las redes españolas de parentesco, como creadoras y reproductoras de los órdenes institucionales (asentamientos de la población, organizaciones económicas, regímenes políticos, representaciones culturales, etcétera) que se han venido sucediendo sobre el territorio español. Una empresa tan ambiciosa que amenazaba con resultar fallida, pero que viene a suponer un indudable progreso respecto a los escasos precedentes con que contábamos: la monografía de David Reher La familia en España. Pasado y presente (Alianza, 1996) y La historia de la familia en la península Ibérica (UCLM, 2008) compilado por Francisco García González (que también firma aquí uno de los mejores capítulos).
posdata denada espero que te aiga servido de ayuda
