1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mixer [17]
3 years ago
7

You are comparing three investments, all of which pay $100 a month and have an interest rate of 8 percent. One is ordinary annui

ty, one is an annuity due, and the third investment is a perpetuity. Which one of the following statements is correct given these three investment options?A) To be the perpetuity, the payments must occur on the first day of each monthly periodB) The ordinary annuity would be more valuable than the annuity due if both had a life of 10 yearsC) The present value of the perpetuity has to be higher than the present value of either the ordinary annuity or the annuity dueD) The future value of all three investments must be equalE) The present value of all three investments must be equal
Business
1 answer:
Ivan3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

c. The present value of the perpetuity has to be higher than the present value of either the ordinary annuity or the annuity due

Explanation:

Considering the following statements:

  • the ordinary perpetuity, the payments must occur on the first day of each monthly period. Hence this statement is incorrect.
  • The ordinary annuity would be more valuable than the annuity due if both had a life of 10 years. Incorrect.
  • In case of perpetuity the times is not limited, hence would get the higher return.
You might be interested in
Haven Company uses the percentage of receivables method for recording bad debt expense. The accounts receivable balance is $600,
Katena32 [7]

Answer:

Debit Bad debt expense   $19,000

Credit Allowance for doubtful debt   $19,000

Explanation:

When a company makes sales on account, debit accounts receivable and credit sales. Based on assessment, some or all of the receivables may be uncollectible.  

To account for this, debit bad debit expense and credit allowance for doubtful debt. Should the debt become uncollectible (i.e go bad), debit allowance for doubtful debt and credit accounts receivable.

Where a debit that had previously been determined to have gone bad gets settled, debit cash and credit bad debt expense.

Amount that may be uncollectible

= 4% *  $600,000

= $24,000

Given that the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts has a $5,000 credit balance before adjustment, the additional amount to be adjusted for

= $24,000 - $5,000

= $19,000

7 0
3 years ago
Suppose that the S&P 500, with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 13% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 4%. a.
Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

a. The answers are as follows:

(i) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 4%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0

(ii) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 6.25%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.25

(iii) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 8.50%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.50

(iv) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 10.75%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.75

(v) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 13%; and Beta of Portfolio = 1.0

b. Change in expected return = 9% increase

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete as part b of it is omitted. The complete question is therefore provided before answering the question as follows:

Suppose that the S&P 500, with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 13% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 4%.

a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S&P 500 of (i) 0; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0

b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

The explanation to the answers are now provided as follows:

a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S&P 500 of (i) 0; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0

To calculate these, we use the following formula:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (WS&P * RS&P) + (WT * RT) ………… (1)

Beta of Portfolio = (WS&P * BS&P) + (WT * BT) ………………..………………. (2)

Where;

WS&P = Weight of S&P = (1) – (1v)

RS&P = Return of S&P = 13%, or 0.13

WT = Weight of T-bills = 1 – WS&P

RT = Return of T-bills = 4%, or 0.04

BS&P = 1.0

BT = 0

After substituting the values into equation (1) & (2), we therefore have:

(i) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0 (i.e. WS&P = 0)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0) * 0.04) = 0.04, or 4%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0) * 0) = 0

(ii) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.25 (i.e. WS&P = 0.25)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.25 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.25) * 0.04) = 0.0625, or 6.25%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.25 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.25) * 0) = 0.25

(iii) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.50 (i.e. WS&P = 0.50)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.50 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.50) * 0.04) = 0.0850, or 8.50%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.50 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.50) * 0) = 0.50

(iv) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.75 (i.e. WS&P = 0.75)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.75 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.75) * 0.04) = 0.1075, or 10.75%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.75 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.75) * 0) = 0.75

(v) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 1.0 (i.e. WS&P = 1.0)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (1.0 * 0.13) + ((1 – 1.0) * 0.04) = 0.13, or 13%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (1.0 * 1.0) + (1 – 1.0) * 0) = 1.0

b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

There expected return will increase by the percentage of the difference between Expected Return and Risk free rate. That is;

Change in expected return = Expected Return - Risk free rate = 13% - 4% = 9% increase

4 0
3 years ago
The average annual stock return is 11.3%. If you begin your investment portfolio with $2,000, what will your portfolio be worth
Natasha_Volkova [10]

Answer:

6780$

Explanation:

We first find 11% of 2000 by the following equation

2000 x .11

From this we get the annual interest 226$

226$ x 30 = $6780

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Rachel is on her way to an interview for the position of a project manager. She is trying to prepare for this interview by analy
anzhelika [568]

Answer:

B) she was very calm under pressure

Explanation:

A project manager is a designation in which the management and the responsibility of the entire project lie in the hands of an individual. The responsibilities of planning, running and the execution of the project is undertaken by the project manager.

From the given options, the soft skill of keeping very calm under pressure will be the most relevant for Rachel. All the other three options are the skills relevant for a specific proficiency in the technical field. To be a project manager, calmness, and efficiency to work under pressure is required.

6 0
3 years ago
Is disease prevention by the government a pure public good or a private good? Explain
Lynna [10]
Public good are non-rivalry and non-excludable goods. People can benefit these goods without affecting and reducing its availability to others. Disease prevention by the government is purely public good since it is important to every individual and each person must not have any limitations in receiving these kind of prevention.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Benson Co. purchased land and paid the full purchase price in cash. The journal entry necessary to record this event includes a:
    10·1 answer
  • Jand, Inc., currently pays a dividend of $1.22, which is expected to grow indefinitely at 5%. If the current value of Jand’s sha
    15·1 answer
  • You have an option to attend a Taylor Swift concert or Maroon 5 concert. They are at the same time. You are a huge Taylor Swift
    9·2 answers
  • 10. Which of the following occurrences is the key explanation for the high economic growth in the United States in the past cent
    11·1 answer
  • The Peter's Group originated four years ago, and since then, the company has grown each year. Management has focused on making s
    6·1 answer
  • Dani's denim sells blue jeans. in 2017, dani's specialized in selling moderately priced jeans with a 25% markup. in 2018, dani's
    5·2 answers
  • a. Attracting large amounts of capital is more difficult for partnerships than for corporations because of such factors as unlim
    15·1 answer
  • b. D Corp stock currently trades at $50. August call options on the stock with a strike price of $55 are priced at $5.75. Octobe
    13·1 answer
  • Abbot Corporation reported a net operating loss of $440,000 in 20X3, which the corporation elected to carryforward to 20X4. Incl
    11·1 answer
  • Suppose there is a drastic decrease in excise taxes levied against the suppliers of baseball equipment. What can we expect to se
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!