Berlin. I need 20 characters so I'm just writing this.
Answer:
Depending on who you would choose, the answer is:
Louis Napoleon<u><em> just stuck with his writing and abandoned the people by just giving himself all the power in the new government and removing the existing parliamentary assembly. </em></u>And Otto Von Bismarck's Realpolitik result <em><u>was the Kulturkampf. </u></em>
Explanation:
It's clear that both politicians appeal to the people to achieve their goals, but Louis Napoleon and Otto Von Bismarck acted differently. <u><em>The French politician only proposed the reformation but never put in action (it was something that was only on the paper). In the end, Louis Napoleon decided to renew the Assembly. He opted for the easiest way. </em></u>On the other hand, <u><em>Bismarck was greed and violent when it comes to politics. His Realpolitik resulted in an internal war between the government and the Catholic Church, which became known as the Kulturkampf.</em></u>
Answer:
D. Portuguese
Explanation:
The Portuguese formed alliances with Kongo leaders in the 1400s and 1500s.
The Kongo had been unstable with factional and regional conflicts and accepted an alliance with the Portuguese so they could restore order.
The Kongo leaders gave the Portuguese some colonies, allowing them to trade and have access to the Kongo slave labor.
Answer:
It faced a great deal of opposition
It failed in most of its efforts
(Sorry it’s a little late but I hope it helps)
Explanation:
